Skip to main content
Withdrawal Strategies

Which Retirement Accounts Should You Withdraw From First?

Pomegra Learn

Which Retirement Accounts Should You Withdraw From First?

A typical retiree holds retirement savings across three or four account types: a taxable brokerage account, a traditional IRA or 401(k), a Roth IRA, and possibly an HSA. The order in which you draw from these accounts can mean tens of thousands of dollars in taxes over a 30-year retirement. There is no single "correct" sequence—it depends on your tax bracket, the timing of required minimum distributions (RMDs), and your life expectancy—but powerful principles guide the decision. This article explores how to sequence withdrawals across account types to minimize lifetime taxes and preserve wealth.

Quick definition: Withdrawal sequencing is the strategic order in which you tap taxable, tax-deferred, and Roth accounts to minimize taxes and prolong portfolio longevity.

Key takeaways​

  • Conventional wisdom (Roth last, taxable first) is sound for many retirees but not universally optimal; your tax bracket and RMDs matter greatly.
  • Early withdrawals from traditional IRAs before age 59½ trigger a 10% penalty; exceptions exist (Roth conversions, Substantially Equal Periodic Payments).
  • RMDs at age 73 force withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts regardless of need; early withdrawal planning can reduce RMD burden.
  • Taxable accounts have step-up in basis; Roth accounts have no step-up and no RMDs—this changes the lifetime tax math.
  • Coordinating withdrawals with Medicare income thresholds, Social Security taxation, and tax-bracket management is where real tax optimization happens.

The conventional withdrawal sequence​

The most commonly recommended sequence is:

  1. Taxable brokerage accounts (first)
  2. Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s (second)
  3. Roth IRAs and HSAs (last)

The logic: Taxable accounts have no forced withdrawal schedule, but capital gains taxes accumulate on unrealized gains. Traditional accounts have eventual forced withdrawals (RMDs at 73) and taxes on the full withdrawal amount. Roth accounts grow tax-free forever and have no RMDs, so leaving them alone maximizes long-term tax-free growth.

This sequence works well for many middle-income retirees, but it has exceptions. A retiree in the 12% bracket in early retirement might benefit from withdrawing from a traditional IRA (taxed at 12%) rather than a taxable account with highly appreciated stock (taxed at 15% long-term capital gains rate). The math changes based on bracket, holdings, and future RMDs.

Understanding the tax consequences of each account type​

Taxable accounts:

  • Withdrawals of original basis are not taxable.
  • Withdrawals of unrealized gains trigger capital-gains tax (15% or 20% for long-term gains; rates may vary).
  • Interest and dividends held in the account create annual tax liabilities even if not withdrawn.
  • No RMDs; you can leave it untouched for life.
  • Heirs receive a step-up in basis at death (gains erased).

Traditional IRAs and 401(k)s:

  • Withdrawals are fully taxable as ordinary income (25–37% bracket rates as of mid-2020s, depending on income).
  • RMDs begin at age 73, forcing withdrawals regardless of need.
  • Withdrawals before age 59½ incur a 10% penalty (with exceptions).
  • Heirs inherit this account with a stretch-IRA timeline; they don't receive a step-up in basis.

Roth IRAs:

  • Withdrawals of contributions are never taxable (you paid tax going in).
  • Withdrawals of earnings are tax-free if the account has been open 5+ years and you're age 59½+ (or meet other exceptions).
  • No RMDs during your lifetime; the account grows tax-free forever.
  • Heirs inherit a Roth with no income tax on future withdrawals, but RMDs apply to inherited Roths (under current rules).

HSAs (if held for retirement, not current medical expenses):

  • Withdrawals for qualified medical expenses are tax-free.
  • Other withdrawals are taxable as ordinary income (plus a 20% penalty if used before age 65 for non-medical).
  • No RMDs.
  • The account behaves like a Roth for medical expenses, making it the most tax-advantaged account type.

The case for early taxable-account withdrawal​

The conventional sequence (taxable first) makes sense when:

  • Your taxable account holds low-cost index funds with minimal unrealized gains.
  • Your traditional IRA has substantial gains that will be taxed at your marginal rate in future years.
  • Your early-retirement tax bracket is low (12% federal, perhaps 24% including state), meaning you have "tax room" before hitting higher brackets.

Example: A 62-year-old early-retiree has $300,000 in a taxable index fund (cost basis $200,000, unrealized gain $100,000) and $700,000 in a traditional IRA (all pre-tax contributions). They need $60,000 annually to live on.

If they withdraw from the traditional IRA first:

  • $60,000 withdrawal, all taxable as ordinary income.
  • With modest other income, they're taxed at 22% federal (as of mid-2020s), paying ~$13,200 in tax. Net: $46,800.

If they withdraw from the taxable account instead:

  • $60,000 withdrawal consists of $40,000 basis (not taxed) + $20,000 gains (long-term capital gains at 15%, or $3,000 tax). Net: $57,000.

The taxable-first approach saves $10,200 in this year—and compounds over time, because the traditional IRA can remain untouched and grow tax-deferred.

However, this advantage evaporates if RMDs force traditional IRA withdrawals later (pushing you into higher brackets), or if your taxable account's gains are enormous.

When to prioritize traditional IRA/401(k) withdrawals​

A retiree might benefit from withdrawing more from traditional IRAs before age 73 RMDs kick in:

  • Roth conversion ladder. Convert traditional IRA funds to a Roth IRA in low-income years (e.g., between leaving a job and claiming Social Security). You'll pay tax on the conversion, but at a low rate, and the amount is now in a Roth (tax-free forever). This is legal and can save substantial taxes.

Example: An early retiree (62) leaves their job and has no income in years 1–3 of retirement. Their standard deduction is ~$14,600 (as of mid-2020s). They could convert $100,000 from their traditional IRA to a Roth, paying tax on only $85,400 ($100,000 - $14,600 standard deduction) at 12%, or ~$10,248 in tax. Later, as RMDs force larger withdrawals, that $100,000 is now in a Roth and won't count toward RMD calculations.

  • Reducing RMD burden. RMDs are calculated based on your account balance at the end of the prior year. By withdrawing (or converting) before age 73, you reduce the balance, which reduces future RMDs. For high-income retirees, smaller RMDs mean lower tax brackets, Medicare premiums (IRMAA), and net investment income tax exposure.

Coordinating withdrawals with required minimum distributions​

At age 73, the IRS mandates RMDs from traditional IRAs, SEP IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, and most 401(k)s. The RMD formula is: Account Balance (end of prior year) ÷ IRS Life Expectancy Factor.

Example: A 73-year-old has a $1 million traditional IRA. The IRS life expectancy factor for age 73 is approximately 24.5. RMD = $1,000,000 ÷ 24.5 ≈ $40,816.

This is the minimum you must withdraw. If you need less, you've been forced to take more income (and pay more tax) than planned. If you need more, you can always withdraw extra.

Smart retirees anticipate RMDs years in advance:

  • Between age 59½ and 73, withdraw or convert enough to reduce the traditional IRA balance to a level that yields manageable RMDs later.
  • Use Roth conversions in low-income years to reduce future RMD balances.
  • Coordinate RMD timing with the year you claim Social Security to manage tax brackets.

The step-up in basis advantage and disadvantage​

A taxable account receives a "step-up in basis" at death—your heirs' cost basis becomes the fair-market value on the day you die. All unrealized gains vanish. A traditional IRA receives no step-up; heirs owe income tax on all inherited funds (though rules now require withdrawals over 10 years).

Example: You own $500,000 in stock (cost basis $100,000, gain $400,000) in a taxable account. If you held it until death, your heirs inherit it with a $500,000 cost basis—the $400,000 gain is erased. If you sell it during life, you owe $60,000 in capital-gains tax (15% of $400,000).

This step-up advantage makes holding appreciated assets in taxable accounts valuable if you expect to leave them to heirs. But if you don't plan to leave substantial assets, or if you live into your late 90s and need the money, the step-up is irrelevant.

Conversely, Roth IRAs offer step-up protection in a different way: heirs inherit a Roth with all future growth tax-free (though they must take RMDs over 10 years, with tax-free withdrawals). The combination of step-up (in taxable accounts) and tax-free growth (in Roths) is why wealthy people prioritize leaving Roths to heirs.

Strategic withdrawal sequencing decision tree​

Real-world examples​

Example 1: The early-retiree Roth conversion ladder (ages 55–73) An engineer retires at 55 with $1.5 million in a traditional 401(k) and $200,000 in a taxable account. They have 18 years until RMDs kick in. Instead of drawing from taxable first, they:

  • Years 55–59: Convert $150,000/year from the traditional 401(k) to a Roth IRA (paying tax at their low bracket, ~12%, or $18,000/year).
  • Years 60–62: Withdraw from the taxable account and use prior-year conversions (which can be drawn penalty-free after 5 years).
  • By age 73: Their traditional IRA is $750,000 (vs. $1.5M without conversions). RMDs drop from $61,000+ to ~$30,000. Meanwhile, $900,000 is now in a Roth (tax-free forever).

Lifetime tax savings: ~$200,000 (conservative estimate) by converting in low-bracket years and reducing RMD burden.

Example 2: The high-income retiree coordinating withdrawals A 68-year-old doctor has $2 million in taxable accounts (mostly appreciated stock), $3 million in a traditional IRA, and $500,000 in a Roth. They plan to claim Social Security at 70 (which will push their tax bracket up significantly).

They strategically withdraw:

  • Age 68–69: Taxable account only (~$100,000/year), living on that. Tax cost is low because they're taking long-term capital gains at 15% (their bracket is still relatively low without Social Security).
  • Age 70: Claim Social Security (~$50,000/year), pushing their bracket to 24%. They now avoid traditional IRA withdrawals in that year.
  • Age 73+: RMDs are ~$140,000/year. By having drawn from taxable in years 68–69, their traditional IRA is smaller, RMDs are manageable, and they don't spike into the 35%+ bracket.

Result: Lifetime taxes are ~$300,000 lower than if they had withdrawn evenly across all accounts.

Example 3: The Roth-maximizing strategy (modest income) A retired couple has $500,000 in taxable accounts, $300,000 in traditional IRAs, and $100,000 in Roths. Their Social Security income (~$40,000/year) is their only outside income. They need $80,000 total to live.

Rather than draw from taxable first, they:

  • Draw $40,000 from taxable account (staying well under capital-gains tax thresholds).
  • Convert $40,000 from traditional IRA to Roth (using their standard deduction to offset the conversion).
  • No additional tax owed (because the standard deduction offsets the conversion).
  • In 20 years, that $40,000/year conversion ($800,000 total) has grown to $1.2 million+ in the Roth.

Lifetime tax savings: ~$250,000+ by converting gradually in low-bracket years and maximizing Roth growth.

Common mistakes​

Mistake 1: Withdrawing from Roth "to diversify." A retiree thinks they have "too much" in a Roth and withdraw to "spread things out." This misunderstands Roth's role—it's meant to be left alone to grow tax-free. A Roth is not "overweight" just because it's large; it should be your last withdrawal source.

Mistake 2: Ignoring RMDs until age 73. Missing an RMD results in a 25% penalty (as of recent changes) on the amount not withdrawn. Worse, by age 73, if your traditional IRA is large, RMDs might spike your bracket, trigger higher Medicare premiums, and lose tax-deferral room forever. Plan conversions and withdrawals years before 73.

Mistake 3: Never holding appreciated assets in taxable accounts because of taxes. Some retirees keep 100% of their assets in IRAs and Roths to "avoid taxes." But a taxable account, even with capital-gains tax liability, has step-up in basis at death and provides withdrawal flexibility. A balanced approach uses all account types strategically.

Mistake 4: Withdrawing from traditional IRAs in high-income years. A retiree claims Social Security at 62, which immediately pushes their bracket to 24%, then continues maxing out traditional IRA withdrawals. Instead, they should have drawn from taxable accounts first (years 62–70), so that traditional IRAs remain untouched and smaller RMDs at 73.

Mistake 5: Not coordinating with a tax professional. Withdrawal sequencing interacts with Medicare income thresholds (IRMAA), net investment income tax (NIIT), state taxes, and charitable giving strategies. A one-size-fits-all rule won't optimize your specific situation. Professional tax advice typically pays for itself many times over.

FAQ​

Can I withdraw my Roth IRA contributions penalty-free at any age?​

Yes. You contributed post-tax money to your Roth, so withdrawing contributions (not earnings) is always penalty-free, at any age. This makes Roth IRAs a pseudo-liquid account—if true emergency hits, your contributions are accessible. But don't use this as an excuse to raid your Roth for non-essential spending.

What's a Substantially Equal Periodic Payment (SEPP)?​

SEPP is an IRS rule that lets you withdraw from a traditional IRA before age 59½ without the 10% penalty, as long as you take equal annual withdrawals based on your life expectancy (using IRS tables). Once you start, you must continue for 5 years or until age 59½ (whichever is longer). This is useful for early retirees but locks you into a formula.

Should I always convert my traditional IRA to a Roth?​

Not necessarily. Roth conversions are valuable in low-income years (between leaving a job and claiming Social Security), but converting a large balance in a high-income year might push you into the 35% bracket and create a one-time tax bill you can't afford. Conversions are best done gradually over multiple years, in years when your bracket is genuinely low.

What if my traditional IRA is mostly losses instead of gains?​

You can't "harvest losses" in a traditional IRA the way you can in a taxable account. The IRA rules don't recognize cost basis the way individual stock holdings do. If your IRA holds investments you believe are valueless, the best move is to withdraw them (take the loss conceptually, though tax-wise it's not deductible) and shift remaining IRA funds to better investments.

Does my HSA count as a retirement account for withdrawal purposes?​

If you're using it for medical expenses, it's the most tax-advantaged account (tax-free in and out). If you're letting it accumulate for retirement, yes, treat it like a Roth—withdraw it last. After age 65, you can withdraw HSA funds for non-medical expenses (taxed like traditional IRA income, but no 20% penalty), making it quasi-flexible after your earlier years.

Summary​

Which accounts you withdraw from first is not a one-size-fits-all answer, but powerful principles guide the decision. The conventional sequence—taxable, then traditional, then Roth—works for many retirees, but early-stage Roth conversions, RMD planning, and coordination with Social Security and Medicare can save tens of thousands in taxes. The key is to think of withdrawals strategically across your entire portfolio, not account-by-account, and to plan years in advance for mandatory withdrawals at age 73. Tax rules and benefit calculations change regularly; consult with a tax advisor or CPA to ensure your withdrawal sequence complies with current regulations and optimizes your personal situation.

Next​

→ How Much Can I Safely Spend