Skip to main content
Lifecycle

Sequence-of-Returns Risk

Pomegra Learn

Sequence-of-Returns Risk

Two retirees begin retirement with identical portfolios: $1 million invested in 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Over the next 30 years, their portfolios experience exactly the same average return: 6.8% annually. Yet one retiree ends retirement with $3.2 million while the other runs out of money at 82. The difference is not the average return. The difference is the order of returns.

This phenomenon—sequence-of-returns risk—is one of the most underestimated threats to a successful retirement. Most investors spend their working years thinking about average returns. A 7% average return sounds fine. Over 30 years, it builds wealth. But in retirement, you are withdrawing money from your portfolio each year. If markets crash immediately after you retire, you sell assets at depressed prices to fund living expenses, locking in losses. The portfolio never fully recovers because you are continuously removing capital. Conversely, if markets boom early in retirement, your portfolio grows while you draw from it, creating a cushion that absorbs later downturns.

This is not about volatility in the conventional sense. It is not about the magnitude of market swings. It is about the timing of those swings relative to your withdrawals. It is the interaction between the sequence of returns and the sequence of cash flows. It is why a portfolio that works beautifully in the accumulation phase (where you are adding money) can fail in the withdrawal phase (where you are removing money). It is why many retirees who believe they have a sound plan discover too late that they do not.

The Retirement Red Zone​

The years immediately surrounding retirement—roughly five years before you retire and ten years into retirement—are the most dangerous. This is the "red zone." Markets in this window carry disproportionate weight. If you experience a severe bear market during the red zone, your portfolio faces a permanent loss of wealth that no amount of subsequent bull markets can fully recover.

Consider two scenarios. In Scenario A, a retiree experiences a 40% bear market in year one of retirement and then earns positive returns for the next 29 years. In Scenario B, the same retiree experiences the same 40% bear market in year 25 of retirement. In Scenario A, the early crash forces the retiree to sell a large portion of the portfolio at depressed prices, removing capital that would have recovered in later years. In Scenario B, the late crash occurs after the withdrawal phase is largely complete, so the loss has minimal impact on retirement sustainability. Both retirees experience the same return sequence—just in different order—but their outcomes diverge dramatically.

The historical evidence is sobering. A retiree who retired in 1929 or 2008 and withdrew 4% of their portfolio annually faced portfolio depletion despite holding disciplined to their withdrawal plan. A retiree who retired in 1995 or 2010 and made identical withdrawals saw their portfolio grow substantially. The deciding factor was not investor skill or market timing. It was sequence: pure, dumb luck about when the bear markets arrived.

Defending the Retirement Plan​

The good news is that sequence risk is manageable. You cannot eliminate it, but you can significantly reduce its impact. The core insight is that in the years immediately surrounding retirement, you should hold a larger allocation to bonds, cash, and stable assets. This is not about market timing. It is about ensuring you have withdrawals covered for several years without being forced to sell equities at depressed prices during a crash.

Strategies range from simple to sophisticated. A bond tent holds a raised allocation to bonds during the red zone and gradually shifts back to normal equity exposure. A rising equity glide path does the opposite: hold extra cash or bonds early in retirement and gradually raise equity exposure as you age. A bucket strategy divides your portfolio into time-based slices: cash for one year of expenses, bonds for years two through seven, and equities for longer horizons. A funded ratio approach dynamically shifts allocation based on whether your portfolio is running ahead of or behind your retirement goals.

The most comprehensive approaches couple portfolio management with flexible spending: if markets crash early in retirement, you reduce discretionary spending to preserve capital for later years. This combination—a defensive portfolio structure during the red zone combined with willingness to adjust spending—creates resilience against sequence risk and transforms a treacherous threat into a manageable challenge.

Articles in this chapter​