How Did the Federal Reserve Fail in 1929 and Beyond?

Created in 1913 partly in response to the 1907 panic, the Federal Reserve was America's first attempt at a permanent institutional solution to financial crisis management. Its performance through 1929 and the subsequent depression was, by almost any assessment, a failure—one of the most consequential policy failures in economic history. The Fed contributed to the bubble's formation through its 1927 rate cut; failed to provide adequate emergency liquidity when the crash came; allowed thousands of bank failures to proceed without the lender-of-last-resort support it had been created to provide; and permitted the money supply to contract by approximately a third between 1929 and 1933, converting a severe recession into a decade-long depression. Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz's "A Monetary History of the United States" made the case that the Fed's monetary contraction was the primary cause of the Great Depression's severity—and that case is broadly accepted in modern macroeconomics.

Quick definition: The Federal Reserve's 1929 failure refers to the central bank's combination of errors that contributed to both the speculative bubble and the subsequent depression: its 1927 rate cut that fueled the final speculative phase, its failure to provide adequate emergency liquidity during the crash and subsequent banking failures, and the resulting money supply contraction that transformed a market crash into a decade-long economic depression.

Key takeaways

• The Federal Reserve's 1927 interest rate cut helped fuel the speculative bubble's final phase—a decision made for international monetary reasons that had domestic speculative consequences.
• The Fed's failure to act as lender of last resort during the 1930-1933 banking crisis allowed thousands of bank failures that destroyed the deposit base of millions of Americans.
• The money supply contracted approximately one-third between 1929 and 1933, a catastrophic monetary contraction that transformed recession into depression.
• Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz documented the money supply collapse in "A Monetary History of the United States" (1963), making the Fed's policy failures the central explanation for the Great Depression's severity.
• Ben Bernanke, at Friedman's 90th birthday dinner in 2002, acknowledged on behalf of the Federal Reserve: "You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to you, we won't do it again."
• The Federal Reserve's Depression-era failures directly shaped its response to the 2008 crisis, when Bernanke as chairman deployed the lessons of 1929-33 to prevent a repetition.

The 1927 rate cut and the bubble

The Federal Reserve's most controversial pre-crash decision was the interest rate cut of 1927, when the Fed reduced its discount rate partly to help Britain maintain the gold standard by reducing the interest rate differential attracting gold to America. The rate cut was supported by Benjamin Strong, governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; it was opposed by several other Fed officials who warned it would fuel speculation.

Strong's critics were correct. The 1927 rate cut reduced the cost of margin borrowing, contributed to the final speculative acceleration, and expanded credit availability at a time when speculation was already excessive. Whether a different monetary policy could have contained the 1929 bubble without producing the depression is debated; but the 1927 cut's contribution to the bubble's final phase is broadly accepted.

Strong's death in October 1928—just a year before the crash—removed the Fed's most capable leader at a critical moment. His successors lacked his authority and analytical clarity, contributing to the institutional weakness that characterized the Fed's subsequent response.

The 1929-1933 policy failures

The Fed's most consequential failures were not in contributing to the bubble but in its response to the crisis. Three specific failures stand out:

Failure to prevent bank runs: When bank runs began in 1930 and accelerated through 1931 and 1932, the Fed failed to provide the emergency lending that was its primary justification for existence. Thousands of banks failed—9,000 by some estimates by 1933—each failure destroying depositors' savings and the credit available to the communities those banks served.

Failure to maintain the money supply: As banks failed, the money supply contracted—fewer banks meant fewer deposits and less lending. The Fed allowed this contraction to proceed without offsetting it through monetary expansion. The money supply declined by approximately one-third between 1929 and 1933, the most severe peacetime monetary contraction in American history.

Raising interest rates in 1931: Extraordinarily, the Fed raised interest rates in October 1931—in the middle of the depression—in response to gold outflows triggered by Britain's departure from the gold standard. This contractionary policy, implemented during a deflationary depression, deepened the economic contraction.

The Friedman-Schwartz thesis

Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz's "A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960," published in 1963, made the argument that the Federal Reserve's monetary contraction was the primary cause of the Great Depression's severity. Their analysis showed that the timing and magnitude of bank failures tracked almost perfectly with the timing and magnitude of monetary contraction, and that the monetary contraction explained the depression's depth in ways that did not require the consumption, investment, or external shock theories that had previously dominated.

The Friedman-Schwartz thesis generated decades of academic debate but is now broadly accepted as the central explanation for the Depression's severity. Ben Bernanke's academic work on the Great Depression built on and extended the Friedman-Schwartz framework, leading directly to his approach to the 2008 crisis.

Ben Bernanke's application of the lesson

Bernanke's chairmanship of the Federal Reserve from 2006 to 2014 was shaped throughout by his academic study of the Great Depression. When the 2008 financial crisis developed, Bernanke deployed the lessons of 1929-33 with explicit intent:

• Emergency lending to non-bank institutions (addressing the problem that the Fed had failed to lend to solvent institutions in the 1930s)
• Aggressive money supply expansion through quantitative easing (addressing the monetary contraction the Fed had allowed in the 1930s)
• Maintaining near-zero interest rates for years (avoiding the 1931-style rate increase during depression)

The 2008 crisis produced a severe recession but not a second Great Depression—a difference that Bernanke himself attributed directly to the application of lessons from 1929-33.

Real-world examples

The Fed's Depression-era failures illustrate the most important example in central banking history of what happens when a lender-of-last-resort institution fails to perform its function. The comparison between the 1930-33 bank failure cascade (no Fed intervention, depression) and the 2008 bank stress (massive Fed intervention, recession) is the most controlled experiment in crisis management quality and outcome available in American history.

The ECB's slow response to the European sovereign debt crisis of 2010-2012 provides a more recent example of how central bank hesitation about lender-of-last-resort commitments can transform a manageable crisis into a prolonged contraction—until Draghi's "whatever it takes" commitment in July 2012 provided the credible backstop that the ECB had previously withheld.

Common mistakes

Treating the Federal Reserve as entirely responsible for the Depression. The Fed's monetary contraction was the primary factor amplifying the Depression's severity, but the initial stock market crash, fiscal policy errors (including Smoot-Hawley tariffs), and international gold standard dynamics also contributed. The Friedman-Schwartz thesis is not that monetary policy was the only cause but that it was the primary amplifier.

Assuming that because the Fed created the problem, eliminating the Fed would solve it. The lesson from 1929-33 is that central banks need to perform their functions better, not that central banks should not exist. The pre-Fed period (1907 and earlier) demonstrated the costs of having no central bank.

Ignoring the gold standard constraint. The Fed's policy was partly constrained by gold standard commitments—raising rates in 1931 was a gold standard defense decision. Understanding how international monetary arrangements constrain domestic policy is essential to the full analysis.

FAQ

Could the Fed have prevented the Great Depression?

Friedman and Schwartz argued yes—that maintaining the money supply through open market operations or more aggressive discount window lending would have prevented the monetary contraction that caused the Depression's severity. This counterfactual is accepted by most monetary economists, though the exact depth of the alternative scenario's recession is uncertain.

Was the gold standard a primary cause of the Depression?

The gold standard constrained monetary policy in ways that deepened the Depression: countries on the gold standard were forced to maintain deflationary policies to protect their gold reserves. Countries that left the gold standard earlier (Britain in 1931, the US effectively in 1933) recovered earlier. The gold standard's role was primarily in constraining the Fed's flexibility, with the Fed's decision to prioritize gold standard adherence over monetary stability being the policy error.

When did the Federal Reserve recover its effectiveness?

The Fed's effectiveness was restored partly by FDR's banking holiday and FDIC creation in 1933, which stopped the bank run cascade; partly by the departure from the gold standard; and partly by the Fed's growing understanding of its own role. The Employment Act of 1946, which gave the Fed explicit macroeconomic stabilization mandates, and the Fed-Treasury Accord of 1951, which restored the Fed's monetary policy independence, were key institutional developments in the Fed's recovery.

Related concepts

• The 1929 Crash Story
• National Banking Era and Its Flaws
• Why the Depression Lasted a Decade
• The Road to the Federal Reserve
• Regulators Always Fighting the Last War

Summary

The Federal Reserve's performance in 1929 and the subsequent depression was one of the most consequential policy failures in economic history. Its 1927 rate cut contributed to the bubble's final phase; its failure to provide emergency liquidity during the 1930-1933 banking crisis allowed thousands of bank failures; and the resulting one-third money supply contraction transformed what could have been a severe recession into a decade-long depression. Friedman and Schwartz's "Monetary History" established the money supply collapse as the primary cause of the Depression's severity. Ben Bernanke—who acknowledged these failures on the Fed's behalf in 2002—deployed the lessons of 1929-33 to prevent a repetition during the 2008 crisis, demonstrating that institutional memory of past failures can inform better future responses.

Next

→ The Florida Real Estate Boom and Bust