Skip to main content

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A): the cost of running the organization

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) are the largest component of operating expenses for most companies. They capture the human and infrastructure costs of running the business: sales teams, marketing campaigns, management salaries, office rent, technology systems, legal fees, and corporate overhead. SG&A is where management discipline—or lack thereof—becomes visible in financial statements.

Quick definition: Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) are all operating costs except cost of goods sold and production-related overhead. They include sales commissions, marketing, salaries for administrative and corporate staff, office facilities, insurance, and professional fees.

Key takeaways​

  • SG&A typically represents 50–80% of total operating expenses for most companies
  • SG&A as a percentage of revenue is a key metric for assessing management efficiency and organizational bloat
  • Rising SG&A percentage during revenue decline signals loss of cost discipline; rising SG&A during strong growth is intentional investment
  • SG&A can be aggressively cut during downturns (freezing hires, reducing marketing) but cutting too deeply damages future growth
  • Companies should disclose SG&A breakdowns by component (sales, marketing, administrative) in 10-K filings or earnings call details
  • Analyzing SG&A trends reveals whether management prioritizes growth, profitability, or is transitioning between the two

The anatomy of SG&A: what it includes​

SG&A is a catch-all category for overhead and operational costs not directly tied to producing goods or delivering core services. The typical breakdown includes:

Selling expenses:

  • Sales team salaries, bonuses, and commissions
  • Sales operations and customer relationship management (CRM) systems
  • Sales collateral and product demonstrations
  • Trade shows and customer entertainment
  • Freight and logistics related to customer acquisition

General and administrative expenses:

  • Corporate management salaries (CEO, CFO, HR director, general counsel)
  • Administrative staff (payroll, accounts payable, human resources)
  • Office rent, utilities, and facilities maintenance
  • Office equipment, furniture, and supplies
  • Information technology (servers, software licenses, cybersecurity)
  • Legal and professional services (auditors, lawyers, consultants)
  • Insurance (liability, directors and officers, property)
  • Travel and meetings

Marketing expenses:

  • Advertising (digital, print, television, radio, outdoor)
  • Content creation and brand management
  • Public relations and investor relations
  • Marketing technology and customer analytics platforms
  • Marketing staff salaries (product marketing, demand generation, brand)

Some companies separate marketing into its own line item; others lump it into SG&A. Always check the financial statement footnotes or earnings call to understand the exact composition.

The distinction matters because different components have different operational significance. A company cutting marketing spend might boost short-term earnings but risks long-term market share. A company cutting corporate salaries improves cost structure but might slow decision-making. A company eliminating sales commissions might hurt sales team morale and retention.

Why SG&A is the first line of cost-cutting​

When a company faces margin pressure or an economic slowdown, SG&A is the first target for management cost-cutting. Unlike cost of goods sold, which is constrained by material and labor costs tied to production volume, SG&A contains significant discretionary spending.

During the 2008 financial crisis, retailers aggressively cut SG&A:

  • Frozen hiring of corporate and store staff
  • Reduced advertising and marketing budgets
  • Postponed store openings and renovations
  • Consolidated warehouses and distribution centers
  • Eliminated travel budgets
  • Reduced management salaries and bonuses

These cuts are painful and visible to employees, but they're also relatively fast. A company cannot reduce manufacturing labor or material costs as quickly without halting production; it can reduce marketing spend with a single memo.

However, cutting SG&A too aggressively carries risks. Eliminating sales team positions reduces the company's ability to acquire new customers. Cutting advertising damages brand awareness. Deferring information technology investments creates security and efficiency risks. Over-aggressive SG&A cuts can set a company up for underperformance when economic conditions improve.

The skilled management team recognizes this tradeoff: maintain SG&A levels necessary for long-term competitiveness while eliminating genuine waste and inefficiency.

Analyzing SG&A as a percentage of revenue​

The most useful way to analyze SG&A is as a percentage of revenue:

SG&A Ratio = SG&A Expenses / Revenue

A company with $1 billion in revenue and $300 million in SG&A has an SG&A ratio of 30%. This ratio should be tracked over time and compared to competitors.

What the ratio reveals:

  1. Rising SG&A ratio during revenue growth: The company is investing aggressively in sales, marketing, and infrastructure to capture market share. This is common for high-growth companies and can be justified if revenue growth eventually exceeds cost growth.

  2. Stable SG&A ratio over time: The company has achieved operational maturity; overhead grows with revenue. This is efficient and suggests management discipline.

  3. Declining SG&A ratio over time: The company is achieving true operational leverage. Revenue grows faster than overhead, compressing costs. This is the ideal dynamic and signals improving profitability.

  4. Rising SG&A ratio during revenue decline: A warning sign. The company is not cutting overhead in line with reduced revenue. This suggests management is either expecting a quick recovery (and therefore maintaining capacity) or is losing cost discipline.

For example, consider two companies in economic downturns:

Company A:

  • Year 1: $1,000 million revenue, $300 million SG&A (30% ratio)
  • Year 2: $800 million revenue, $240 million SG&A (30% ratio)

Company A cut SG&A proportionally with revenue decline. Management acted decisively and maintained operational efficiency.

Company B:

  • Year 1: $1,000 million revenue, $300 million SG&A (30% ratio)
  • Year 2: $800 million revenue, $295 million SG&A (37% ratio)

Company B failed to cut SG&A in line with revenue decline. Either management expected a quick recovery that didn't materialize, or there was no discipline. The rising SG&A ratio is a red flag.

Industry variations in SG&A ratios​

SG&A ratios vary significantly by industry, reflecting different business models and customer acquisition strategies:

High SG&A ratios (40–60% of revenue):

  • Financial services and banking: Heavily regulated, requiring compliance and legal overhead. Sales teams manage high-ticket transactions.
  • Healthcare services: Requires administrative staff, billing specialists, and compliance. Heavy insurance and legal costs.
  • Professional services: Fee-based model with limited cost of sales; overhead is primarily skilled staff salaries.
  • E-commerce and direct-to-consumer: Heavy customer acquisition costs and marketing spend to overcome traditional retail distribution.

Medium SG&A ratios (20–40% of revenue):

  • Mature software (SaaS): Low COGS means SG&A is the primary cost. Mature companies optimize ratios through leverage.
  • Specialty manufacturing: Requires engineering, quality assurance, and customer support overhead.
  • Retail: Store operating costs, head office staff, and some marketing.

Lower SG&A ratios (10–25% of revenue):

  • Commodity producers: Low overhead relative to production costs; commodity pricing limits margins.
  • Utilities: Highly regulated, mature business with stable customer base and limited customer acquisition needs.
  • Discount retailers: Minimal corporate overhead and marketing; rely on low-cost operations and customer traffic.

When evaluating a company's SG&A ratio, always compare to direct competitors in the same industry. A software company with a 35% SG&A ratio might be inefficient compared to competitors at 25%. A professional services firm with a 45% SG&A ratio might be doing better than competitors at 50%.

The marketing component: growth investment or waste?​

Marketing and advertising expenses are embedded in SG&A and are a source of ongoing tension in business analysis. Are they productive investments in brand and customer acquisition, or marketing waste?

The answer depends on return. A software company that spends $10 million on marketing and acquires customers who generate $50 million in lifetime revenue has deployed marketing effectively. A company that spends $10 million and acquires customers generating $5 million in revenue has wasted money.

The challenge is that marketing effectiveness takes years to assess. Brand building, in particular, is a long-term investment. A consumer goods company might spend heavily on advertising to build brand loyalty that persists for decades. Short-term profit maximizers would criticize the spend; long-term strategists would defend it.

When analyzing marketing spend:

  1. Look for trends: Is marketing spend growing, stable, or declining as a percentage of revenue? Growing spend during a growth phase is normal; growing spend during a mature phase might signal inefficiency.

  2. Compare to competitors: How does this company's marketing-to-revenue ratio compare to peers?

  3. Assess effectiveness: If available, look for metrics like customer acquisition cost (CAC), payback period, or return on marketing investment disclosed in earnings calls.

  4. Understand the strategy: Is the company building brand (long-term) or generating immediate sales (short-term)? Different strategies justify different spend levels.

  5. Watch for bloat: If marketing spend is growing much faster than revenue growth, marketing efficiency is declining, and questions should be raised.

SG&A benchmarking and peer comparison​

To assess whether a company's SG&A ratio is reasonable:

  1. Calculate the company's SG&A ratio using the most recent year's financials: SG&A / Revenue

  2. Find three to five direct competitors and calculate their SG&A ratios from their latest 10-K filings

  3. Average the competitors' ratios to establish an industry benchmark

  4. Compare the target company's ratio to the benchmark:

    • If 5+ percentage points below: The company may be underinvesting in sales, marketing, or infrastructure; growth could be constrained
    • If within 5 points: The company is operating at industry-standard efficiency
    • If 5+ percentage points above: The company has bloated overhead, poor cost discipline, or is investing heavily for growth (context matters)

  5. Track the trend: Plot the company's SG&A ratio over 8 quarters. An improving trend (declining ratio) is favorable; a deteriorating trend is concerning.

For example, if the industry average SG&A ratio is 35% and a company reports 42%, there's a 7-point gap. This could indicate:

  • Inefficient sales or marketing operations (likely negative)
  • Heavy investment in new market expansion (could be positive if revenue growth justifies it)
  • One-time integration costs from a recent acquisition (temporary)
  • Different accounting treatment of certain costs (check footnotes)

Understanding the reason for the gap is crucial before drawing conclusions.

A flowchart of SG&A decision-making​

Real-world example: Salesforce's SG&A evolution​

Salesforce exemplifies the typical trajectory of a high-growth company investing in SG&A for market expansion, then gradually improving efficiency:

2010: Revenue $1.66 billion, SG&A $839 million, SG&A ratio 50.5%. Salesforce was aggressively investing in sales and marketing to expand its installed base and market share in enterprise software.

2015: Revenue $5.37 billion, SG&A $2.43 billion, SG&A ratio 45.3%. The company had matured but still maintained high spending to defend market position against competitors like Oracle and SAP.

2020: Revenue $17.1 billion, SG&A $7.24 billion, SG&A ratio 42.3%. SG&A ratio was declining slightly, showing early signs of operational leverage as the installed customer base grew without proportional new selling costs.

2023: Revenue $32.0 billion, SG&A $11.9 billion, SG&A ratio 37.2%. The company had achieved significant operational leverage. Each dollar of new revenue required proportionally less incremental selling and administrative cost, improving profitability.

This trajectory is typical for successful software and technology companies. High SG&A ratios in the growth phase are justified by rapid revenue growth. As the company matures, the ratio improves, delivering accelerating profit growth.

Common mistakes in SG&A analysis​

  1. Assuming all SG&A cuts are positive: Cutting marketing spend boosts short-term earnings but might undermine long-term growth. Always assess the tradeoff between short-term profit and long-term competitiveness.

  2. Ignoring one-time charges embedded in SG&A: Restructuring costs, severance, litigation settlements, or integration costs are sometimes included in reported SG&A. Always separate recurring from non-recurring items. Read the 10-K footnote on restructuring charges.

  3. Not accounting for accounting differences: Some companies classify certain costs differently. One might include customer support in SG&A; another includes it in COGS (as a customer success cost). Always compare like-for-like by reading accounting policy footnotes.

  4. Comparing across industries without context: A pharmaceutical company's 25% SG&A ratio might signal bloat, while a software company's 40% might signal underinvestment. Comparisons are only valid within industries.

  5. Forgetting that SG&A includes essential functions: Cutting legal, compliance, or cybersecurity spending can reduce costs but increase risk. Not all SG&A is discretionary.

  6. Overlooking geographic variation: A company with major international operations might have higher SG&A ratios due to duplicate administrative functions. A domestic-only company might have lower ratios. Understand the operating footprint.

FAQ​

What is a good SG&A ratio? Depends on industry. For software, 30–45% is typical. For retailers, 20–35%. For professional services, 40–60%. Always compare to direct competitors.

Why do some companies separately disclose sales and marketing expenses? To provide transparency on growth investment. A company spending heavily on marketing wants investors to understand that this is deliberate investment in revenue growth, not wasteful overhead.

How do I account for stock-based compensation in SG&A? It's included in reported SG&A. Some analysts add it back as non-cash for comparison purposes, but it's a real economic expense.

Can SG&A be capitalized as an asset? Typically no. SG&A is expensed as incurred. However, certain development or acquisition costs might be capitalized under specific circumstances. Check the accounting policy footnote.

What if SG&A is rising faster than revenue but the company is still growing? Context matters. If revenue is growing at 15% but SG&A is growing at 20%, the company is losing operational leverage. This could be intentional (aggressive hiring to support future growth) or a sign of inefficiency.

How do I forecast SG&A for a growing company? Use the historical SG&A ratio as a baseline, but adjust for:

  • Planned headcount expansion (disclosed in guidance)
  • New market entry or geographic expansion
  • Expected operating leverage gains
  • One-time costs (integration, restructuring)
  • Changes in technology or infrastructure investments

Should I include corporate allocations in divisional SG&A analysis? Yes, but be careful. Some companies allocate corporate overhead to divisions; others don't. For company-level analysis, use consolidated figures. For division analysis, understand how corporate costs are allocated.

  • Operating expenses: SG&A, R&D, and more
  • Research and development (R&D): expense vs investment
  • Stock-based compensation: the silent expense
  • Understanding the income statement: structure and purpose

Summary​

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) represent the largest component of operating costs for most companies and reveal management discipline in controlling overhead. SG&A as a percentage of revenue is a critical efficiency metric—declining ratios signal improving operational leverage, while rising ratios during revenue decline signal cost discipline issues. The composition of SG&A (sales, marketing, administrative) varies by business model, with high-growth companies typically maintaining higher ratios while mature companies achieve lower ratios through leverage. Industry context is essential; software and technology companies operate at higher SG&A ratios than retailers or utilities. Analyzing SG&A trends relative to revenue growth reveals whether management is investing intentionally for future growth or losing cost discipline. Marketing expenses embedded in SG&A deserve scrutiny, as they represent investments in customer acquisition whose returns may take years to materialize. By benchmarking a company's SG&A ratio against competitors and tracking it over time, investors gain insight into management quality and the trajectory of profitability improvement.

Next​

Research and development (R&D): expense vs investment