Skip to main content
Stock Market

GAAP vs. Adjusted EPS

Pomegra Learn

GAAP vs. Adjusted EPS

Nearly every earnings report contains two sets of profit numbers: GAAP earnings (which follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and adjusted or non-GAAP earnings, which companies calculate by adding back or subtracting certain items they consider non-recurring or unusual. Understanding the difference is crucial because companies often emphasize adjusted earnings when they're higher than GAAP earnings, effectively telling investors "the real profit was bigger than what the accounting rules require us to report."

GAAP earnings are the official, audited numbers that appear in a company's financial statements. They're calculated by following strict accounting rules set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. These rules are designed to ensure consistency and comparability across companies and industries. When a company reports GAAP earnings per share (EPS), it's the bottom line according to the rulebook—it's what corporate accountants must use.

But companies argue that GAAP earnings sometimes obscure the "true" operational performance of the business. If a company spends a quarter restructuring its operations, firing workers, and closing facilities, GAAP accounting forces it to record large one-time charges for severance, facilities closure costs, and asset write-downs. This makes GAAP earnings look awful that quarter, even though management argues that the actual ongoing business is healthy. To show this perspective, they report "adjusted" earnings that exclude the restructuring charges, arguing that investors should focus on the operational results of the continuing business.

This logic sounds reasonable—and in some cases, it is. A truly one-time event like a natural disaster or the impact of changing accounting rules might legitimately be excluded to show what's normal for the business. But therein lies the danger. Companies have significant discretion in deciding what's "one-time" or "unusual." A company could exclude losses from bad investments, charges for outdated inventory, or costs from losing a major customer, calling each one "non-recurring" even if these events happen regularly. When companies repeatedly report large adjusted earnings that are significantly higher than GAAP earnings, it's worth asking: if these items are truly non-recurring, why do they keep recurring?

Watching for Warning Signs​

The gap between GAAP and adjusted earnings is a warning light. If GAAP earnings are falling while adjusted earnings are rising, the company might be masking deteriorating business quality. Professional investors track what percentage of a company's total charges become "adjusted" items. A company that excludes only 3% of costs might have legitimate one-time items, but a company that adjusts away 15% or 20% of charges is essentially redefining what counts as profit.

Some companies adjust for items that clearly don't belong, like stock-based compensation or depreciation. These are real costs—paying employees in stock is just as much a cost as paying them in cash. Excluding them distorts the true profitability of the business. The most transparent companies disclose what adjustments they've made and why, making it easy for investors to understand the difference. Companies that bury adjusted items or use confusing terminology are often trying to hide something.

Articles in this chapter​