Skip to main content

What Problem Does Cryptocurrency Try to Solve?

Before diving into wallets, exchanges, and blockchain technology, you need to understand the fundamental question: Why does cryptocurrency exist in the first place? What problem was so pressing that people spent billions of dollars and countless hours developing an entirely new monetary system?

The answer is deceptively simple: cryptocurrency exists because traditional banking systems have real limitations, and some people needed an alternative. Whether that alternative actually works better is a question we'll explore throughout this chapter, but understanding the original problem is essential to making sense of crypto's promises and its shortcomings.

Quick definition: Cryptocurrency is a digital currency designed to work as a medium of exchange without requiring a bank or government to validate transactions. It uses cryptographic technology to secure transactions and control the creation of new units.

Key Takeaways​

  • The middleman problem: Traditional money systems require trusted intermediaries (banks, governments, payment processors) who charge fees, introduce delays, and can deny service
  • Cross-border friction: Sending money internationally through banks is expensive, slow (3-5 business days), and generates billions in unnecessary fees annually
  • Currency instability: In countries with high inflation or political instability, people need alternative stores of value that don't depend on government management
  • Financial exclusion: Billions of people lack access to banking services, preventing them from participating in the global economy
  • Technological innovation: The invention of blockchain made it theoretically possible to verify transactions without a trusted authority
  • A real use case: Crypto genuinely solves the problem of peer-to-peer value transfer, though it creates new problems in the process

The Baseball Card Trust Problem​

Think back to your childhood. If you and a friend wanted to trade baseball cards, you simply handed over the cards and received others in return. No middleman. No waiting. No fees. You trusted each other because you were in the same room, and both parties could immediately verify they'd received what was promised.

Now imagine your friend lives in another country. You can't meet in person. You don't know if they'll send you the cards after you send yours. You need someone to hold the cards while both parties verify the trade is legitimate. Enter the trusted third party—perhaps an online marketplace like eBay, a bank, or a payment processor. That intermediary:

  • Holds the baseball cards (or money) while verifying both parties
  • Confirms the seller actually has the cards to send
  • Confirms the buyer actually has the money to pay
  • Charges a fee for this service (typically 2-15% depending on the platform)
  • Takes responsibility if something goes wrong
  • Has the power to refuse service to either party

For centuries, the bank served this role in the monetary system. Banks solved a genuine, critical problem: they let you send money to someone far away without meeting face-to-face. But that solution came with significant costs and limitations.

The Real-World Costs of Banking as a Middleman​

Let's look at concrete numbers:

A freelancer in India earns $2,000 per month from US clients. To move that money back home to support their family, they face these costs through traditional banking:

  • Transfer fee: $25-50 per transaction
  • Exchange rate markup: 1-3% worse than the real market rate
  • Processing time: 3-5 business days minimum
  • Frequency limit: Often can only do one or two per week

Over a year, that $2,000/month income is subject to:

  • Annual fees: $25 × 12 months = $300 minimum
  • Exchange rate loss: ~2% × $24,000 = $480 annually
  • Total annual cost: ~$800-1,200, or 3.3-5% of annual income

This pattern affects millions of people. The World Bank estimates that remittances (money sent from workers in one country to family in another) total approximately $800 billion annually worldwide. Fees, delays, and exchange rate markups on these transfers generate an estimated $40-50 billion in unnecessary costs annually—money that could go directly to families but instead goes to banks and payment processors.

Currency Instability and Government Control​

The remittance problem is manageable inconvenience for someone in the US sending money to India. But what if you live somewhere with currency instability?

Consider these real-world examples:

Venezuela: In 2016-2019, Venezuela's currency (the bolívar) lost approximately 99.9% of its value due to hyperinflation. A family's life savings deposited in a Venezuelan bank would become worthless. Many Venezuelans turned to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a more stable store of value. While crypto is volatile, it's far less volatile than a currency in free fall. This wasn't an abstract theoretical problem—it was a survival mechanism.

Argentina: Argentina has a long history of currency crises and periodic freezing of bank accounts. Citizens wanting to protect their savings from government controls have used crypto to move wealth across borders without requiring permission from any government authority.

Turkey: During periods of currency instability, Turkish citizens have used crypto to preserve wealth outside their national financial system.

Zimbabwe: During hyperinflation periods, Zimbabweans used cryptocurrencies and mobile money systems as an alternative to a currency becoming worthless daily.

These aren't hypothetical scenarios discussed in academic papers. These are millions of real people making the choice to use cryptocurrency because the alternative—trusting their government's currency—had catastrophically failed.

The Financial Exclusion Problem​

According to the World Bank, approximately 1.7 billion adults are unbanked or underbanked—they lack access to basic banking services. In developed countries like the US, this seems almost incomprehensible. You can open a bank account, get a debit card, and transfer money instantly.

But in many parts of the world:

  • There are no physical bank branches within 50+ miles
  • Opening a bank account requires documentation you don't have
  • Minimum balance requirements exclude poor people
  • Political corruption means government can freeze accounts at will
  • Banks charge fees that consume 10-30% of poor people's income

Without a bank account, you cannot:

  • Safely store money
  • Build credit history
  • Access loans for education or business
  • Participate in the wider economy
  • Send money to family in other regions

A cryptocurrency wallet, by contrast, requires nothing but a smartphone and an internet connection. No approval process. No minimum balance. No government permission. A teenager in Nigeria can create a Bitcoin wallet, receive payment for work, and store their earnings without needing permission from any bank or government.

The Settlement and Speed Problem​

When you send money through a bank, you might see it disappear from your account instantly, but it doesn't actually arrive at the recipient's bank for 3-5 business days. Why? Because the banking system is built on layers of verification:

  1. Your bank verifies you have the money
  2. They send instructions to an intermediary network (like SWIFT for international transfers)
  3. The receiving country's intermediary bank receives the message
  4. The receiving bank verifies the sender's bank is legitimate
  5. The receiving bank finally credits the recipient's account

Each step involves different organizations, time zones, business hours, and security protocols. None of this is necessary from a technological perspective—it's simply how the system was built in the 1970s-2000s before internet-based solutions existed.

Bitcoin's blockchain can settle transactions in about 10 minutes. Ethereum in about 12 seconds. The technology allows for settlements far faster than the current banking system, though whether crypto fully eliminates the settlement problem in practice is debatable.

What Crypto Actually Solved (Technically)​

Here's what cryptocurrency genuinely achieved: it solved the computer science problem of trustless verification.

For thousands of years, value transfer required trust in something:

  • Gold requires trusting that it's real and weighing it accurately
  • Paper money requires trusting government not to print infinitely
  • Bank accounts require trusting the bank won't fail or freeze your account

Bitcoin's innovation was creating a system where two strangers could exchange value without trusting:

  • Each other
  • A bank
  • A government
  • Any company or middleman

The transaction itself, verified by the network's mathematical consensus, becomes the proof. This was a genuine technological breakthrough in distributed systems and cryptography.

Real-World Examples That Shaped Crypto​

The 2008 Financial Crisis: Banks failed catastrophically. Lehman Brothers, which had been operating for 158 years, collapsed overnight. Governments bailed out banks with taxpayer money while ordinary people lost their life savings. Bitcoin's whitepaper (published October 2008) specifically cited distrust in centralized financial institutions. Many early Bitcoin adopters were motivated by witnessing this failure.

Cyprus Banking Crisis (2013): Cyprus's banks collapsed, and the government imposed a haircut—they simply took 10-40% of people's bank deposits to prevent a complete systemic failure. If you had €100,000 in a Cypriot bank, the government unilaterally decided you now had €60,000-90,000. This demonstrated that even in a European democracy, governments can take your money from the bank. Bitcoin supporters pointed to this as proof that keeping assets outside the banking system was essential.

Mt. Gox Exchange Failure (2014): Mt. Gox was the largest Bitcoin exchange at the time, handling ~70% of all Bitcoin trades. A hacker breach or internal theft resulted in the loss of approximately 850,000 Bitcoins (worth ~$500 million at the time). The exchange simply disappeared, and users lost everything. This taught the crypto community that exchanges (centralized trusted parties) recreate the same risk as banks—you need to hold your own private keys.

PayPal and Visa Outages: Throughout the 2010s, payment processing networks repeatedly experienced outages that prevented millions of transactions. A 2013 Reddit outage caused by payment processing failures highlighted how dependent modern commerce is on these centralized gatekeepers.

Common Mistakes and Misconceptions​

Mistake #1: "Crypto has replaced banks"

Many people think that cryptocurrency's promise was to eliminate banking entirely. It wasn't. Most people still trust their bank more than their own ability to keep a secret code (private key) secure. That's entirely rational. Crypto solved the technical problem of trustless transfer but didn't solve the human problems of security, regulation, usability, or legal certainty. Most people use both banks and crypto.

Mistake #2: "Crypto eliminated all fees"

While crypto reduces some fees, it doesn't eliminate them:

  • Exchange fees: typically 0.1-0.5% when buying/selling
  • Network fees: typically $1-50 depending on transaction size and network congestion
  • Wallet service fees: some wallet providers charge small fees
  • Tax reporting fees: complex accounting requirements

Mistake #3: "The problem crypto solves applies to everyone"

The problems crypto solves are real for billions of people (remittance workers, currency refugees, the unbanked). But for someone in a developed country with stable currency, access to banking, and trust in government institutions, crypto solves fewer practical problems. You might use it for speculation or as a technology experiment, but you don't need it to send money to family or preserve wealth.

Mistake #4: "Crypto prevents all transaction fraud"

Bitcoin transactions are immutable (once confirmed, they cannot be reversed), but the transaction itself can still be fraudulent. If someone tricks you into sending them Bitcoin, there's no way to reverse it. If a hacker steals your private key and sends your crypto, you have no recourse. The blockchain doesn't prevent fraud; it just makes it permanent.

Mistake #5: "Governments can't regulate or control crypto"

While governments cannot directly control a public blockchain like Bitcoin, they absolutely can regulate the on-and-off ramps (exchanges), tax transactions, and criminalize possession in their jurisdictions. If you buy Bitcoin at a regulated exchange, that transaction is recorded and taxable. The idea of crypto being "beyond government control" overstates the technology's sovereignty.

FAQ: Understanding Crypto's Core Problem​

Q1: If crypto is so great for remittances, why don't most remittance workers use it?

A: Several reasons. Many remittance workers lack smartphone/internet access, are unfamiliar with crypto, don't trust it, or live in countries where it's not widely accepted. Additionally, they still need to convert crypto back to local currency, which requires accessing an exchange (which brings back the middleman problem). Money transfer apps like M-Pesa in Kenya have actually solved the remittance problem more effectively for most users in the developing world than Bitcoin has.

Q2: Doesn't the government already have ways to freeze bank accounts? Why is that any better than banks freezing crypto exchange accounts?

A: True—they're different risks. A government can freeze your bank account through legal processes. A payment processor can freeze your exchange account for violating terms of service. The advantage of crypto is that if you hold your own private keys, the government cannot freeze your on-chain assets without your cooperation (they could jail you, but not directly access the blockchain). This is valuable in countries with severe political persecution or capital controls, less so in countries with rule of law.

Q3: If crypto is the answer, why do most wealthy people keep their money in banks, not Bitcoin?

A: Because wealthy people's risk profile is different. They benefit from:

  • Insurance protections on bank deposits
  • Legal recourse if fraud occurs
  • Stable purchasing power (banks don't lose 30% of their value in a week)
  • Easier tax compliance
  • Ability to take loans against deposits
  • Integration with the global financial system

For them, the risks of crypto outweigh the benefits. The benefits accrue more to people whose only option is an unstable currency or no banking at all.

Q4: Doesn't quantum computing threaten cryptocurrency?

A: Yes, sufficiently powerful quantum computers could theoretically crack the cryptographic keys securing Bitcoin and Ethereum. This is a known risk. Researchers are already developing quantum-resistant cryptography. It's a long-term concern but not an immediate threat—quantum computers capable of this don't exist yet.

Q5: What about transaction privacy? Doesn't crypto provide better privacy than banks?

A: It's complicated. Bitcoin transactions are pseudonymous but not anonymous—they're recorded on a public ledger. Anyone can see the transaction but not necessarily know who sent it. However, sophisticated blockchain analysis can often identify who sent what. Additionally, regulations now require exchanges to collect identifying information (KYC—Know Your Customer rules), which defeats privacy benefits. Monero and a few other cryptocurrencies offer stronger privacy but are either not widely accepted or explicitly avoided due to regulatory concerns.

Summary​

Cryptocurrency exists because real problems exist: cross-border payments are expensive and slow, currencies in unstable countries lose value rapidly, billions of people lack access to banking services, and settlement times in traditional systems are unnecessarily long. Bitcoin and blockchain technology genuinely solved a computer science problem—enabling trustless verification between strangers. However, solving the technical problem doesn't automatically solve the human, regulatory, or practical problems that come with adoption. For remittance workers, currency refugees, and the unbanked, crypto offers real benefits. For most people in developed countries with stable currencies and access to banking, the benefits are less clear and the risks more pronounced.

Deeper coverage in Book 18 — Cryptocurrency for Beginners.

Next​

→ Next article: What is Blockchain?