Skip to main content

Is Cryptocurrency Actually Money? An Honest Assessment

We've covered what cryptocurrency is, how it works, what problems it solves, and the real risks involved. Now the fundamental question: Is cryptocurrency actually money?

This seems simple but isn't. Money has specific functions defined by economics, and whether cryptocurrency fulfills them determines if it's money or something else (digital asset, speculative tool, technology platform, store of value). The honest answer: some cryptocurrencies partially function as money in specific contexts; others are something else entirely. Understanding money's functions is essential for answering this question.

Quick definition: Money is anything that serves three functions: store of value (preserves purchasing power over time), medium of exchange (widely accepted for payment), and unit of account (prices are denominated in it). Cryptocurrency's fulfillment of these functions varies dramatically by type and context.

Key Takeaways​

  • Bitcoin: Partial store of value (volatile but perceived as valuable long-term), limited medium of exchange (<1% of transactions), poor unit of account (prices in dollars not Bitcoin)
  • Ethereum: Not money at all—it's infrastructure/technology, not a medium of exchange
  • Stablecoins (USDC): Actually function as money (stable value, growing acceptance, unit of account possible)
  • Government money (dollars, euros): True money (stable value, universally accepted, prices denominated in currency)
  • Gold: Good store of value, poor medium of exchange, poor unit of account (similar to Bitcoin)
  • Money exists on a spectrum: Perfect money (government fiat) to non-money (random tokens)
  • Cryptocurrency's status: Hybrid—money-like in some contexts (high-inflation countries, remittances), investment asset in others

The Three Functions of Money​

Economists identify three functions that define money. Something doesn't have to excel at all three to be money, but it should perform them reasonably well.

Function #1: Store of Value​

Money should preserve purchasing power over time. You should be able to save $100 today and spend it on roughly equivalent goods weeks or months later.

Bitcoin's store-of-value performance:

  • 2020: ~$7,000
  • 2021: ~$69,000 (900% gain in one year)
  • 2022: ~$16,000 (77% loss in one year)
  • 2023: ~$43,000 (recovering)
  • 2024: $40,000-65,000 (range varies daily)

Your $100 of Bitcoin could be worth $1,400 or $200 within a year. This volatility makes it a terrible store of value for ordinary purposes (savings). Excellent for speculation; terrible for storing wealth reliably.

Why Bitcoin is volatile:

  • Fixed supply (capped at 21 million)
  • High demand variation (adoption, regulation, sentiment)
  • Young market (13 years old, still discovering price)
  • Leverage (traders borrowing to amplify positions)
  • No dividend/earnings (pure sentiment-based pricing)
  • Regulatory uncertainty (legal status varies by country)

Ethereum's store-of-value performance: Even more volatile than Bitcoin (often 2-3x Bitcoin's swings)

Stablecoins (USDC) store-of-value performance:

  • Always worth approximately $1.00 (within 0.1%)
  • Excellent store of value (over short timescales)
  • Only risk: Issuer insolvency, regulatory changes, depeg risk
  • More stable than Bitcoin by orders of magnitude

Government money (US dollar) store-of-value performance:

  • Stable (no 50% swings in days)
  • Inflation erodes it (~3% annually, expected)
  • Good store of value for years (if you accept inflation)
  • Less good for decades (inflation compounds)

Verdict on function #1:

  • Bitcoin: Poor store of value (volatility is extreme, unpredictable)
  • Ethereum: Terrible store of value (more volatile than Bitcoin)
  • Stablecoins: Good store of value (stable, but counterparty risk)
  • Dollars: Excellent store of value (stable, predictable inflation)
  • Gold: Good store of value (stable, similar to dollars)

Function #2: Medium of Exchange​

Money should be widely accepted for payment. You should be able to trade it for goods and services.

Bitcoin's acceptance and usage (2024):

  • Large retailers: Rare (<50 globally, Whole Foods, Tesla recently stopped)
  • Small businesses: Growing but still <5% of merchants
  • Global adoption: Varies wildly (large in El Salvador, banned in China)
  • Percentage of transactions: <0.1% of global commerce
  • Payment processors: Square (now Block), PayPal, Stripe support it

Can you go to a restaurant and pay in Bitcoin? In some places yes (El Salvador, parts of US, Switzerland); in most places no. For Bitcoin to truly be a medium of exchange, you'd expect to be able to pay for everyday items anywhere.

Why Bitcoin hasn't become a medium of exchange:

  • Volatility: Price swings make merchants uncomfortable (price their goods in Bitcoin? risky)
  • Slow settlement: 10+ minutes for confirmation is too slow for retail
  • Complex for merchants: Requires technical knowledge and setup
  • Tax implications: Each transaction is taxable (makes everyday use expensive)
  • Better alternatives exist: Credit cards are faster, easier, offer fraud protection
  • Price is right: When Bitcoin is cheap ($1,000), usage increases; when expensive ($60K), people hold instead

Ethereum's acceptance as medium of exchange:

  • Medium of exchange? No. It's not designed for this.
  • Utility: Token for Ethereum network (paying gas fees), not payment medium
  • Try paying for coffee in Ethereum? Nearly impossible, no merchant accepts

Stablecoins (USDC) acceptance:

  • Large retailers: Some (mostly online, crypto-native)
  • Small businesses: Growing (especially in emerging markets with currency crises)
  • Global adoption: Better than Bitcoin, worse than dollars
  • Percentage of transactions: <0.01% currently, but growing
  • Use cases: Remittances, international transfers, emerging markets

Stablecoins show more promise as medium of exchange because stability makes merchants comfortable.

Dollars acceptance:

  • Large retailers: Universal (100%)
  • Small businesses: Universal
  • Global adoption: Dominant (though euros, yuan, other currencies exist)
  • Percentage of transactions: ~80%+ (varies by country)

Verdict on function #2:

  • Bitcoin: Limited medium of exchange (growing but <1% of transactions, mainly speculation)
  • Ethereum: Not a medium of exchange (not designed for payments)
  • Stablecoins: Growing medium of exchange (increasingly used, but still <1%)
  • Dollars: Excellent medium of exchange (universal acceptance)

Function #3: Unit of Account​

Prices should be denominated in the currency. When you buy groceries, the price is in dollars, not requiring conversion.

Bitcoin as unit of account (2024 reality):

  • Groceries: $100 (not 0.0025 BTC)
  • Restaurant meal: $25 (not 0.0006 BTC)
  • House: $500,000 (not 12.5 BTC)
  • Car: $30,000 (not 0.75 BTC)

Prices are universally quoted in fiat currency (dollars, euros), then converted to Bitcoin if someone wants to pay in crypto. Bitcoin is not used as a unit of account—nobody prices groceries in Bitcoin.

Why Bitcoin hasn't become unit of account:

  • Volatility: If you price in Bitcoin, your prices change daily (not practical)
  • Merchant discomfort: Requires re-pricing constantly
  • Customer confusion: Customers expect prices in their home currency
  • Market practice: Fiat currency has network effects (everyone uses it)
  • Historical path: Once established, units of account are sticky

Ethereum as unit of account:

  • Not used as unit of account (nor intended to be)

Stablecoins as unit of account:

  • Some merchants quote prices in USDC (especially in crypto-native businesses)
  • But usually as equivalent to dollars (not independent unit)
  • Growing adoption among crypto-native services
  • But still minimal: <0.1% of global transactions

Dollars as unit of account:

  • Perfect—all prices denominated in dollars
  • This gives fiat currency enormous advantage
  • Unit of account function reinforces medium of exchange function
  • Creates network effects that are extremely hard to overcome

Verdict on function #3:

  • Bitcoin: Not a unit of account (prices never denominated in Bitcoin)
  • Ethereum: Not a unit of account
  • Stablecoins: Partial (some use, but mainly as dollar proxy)
  • Dollars: Excellent unit of account

The Honest Assessment​

Bitcoin: Digital Gold, Not Money​

Bitcoin passes function #2 partially (growing but limited acceptance) but fails functions #1 and #3.

What Bitcoin actually is:

  • Store of value (like gold): Volatility too high for ordinary savings, but perceived as valuable long-term hedge
  • Speculative investment: High volatility attracts traders
  • Hedge: Against currency collapse or financial system failure
  • Censorship-resistant value transfer: Can't be frozen or confiscated

Is Bitcoin money? Technically no. It doesn't function as money for most uses. It's more like digital gold or speculative investment. Used by some as a unit of account (especially in countries with currency crises), but rare globally.

Where Bitcoin is closest to money:

  • El Salvador: Legal tender, some merchants accept (though most immediately convert to dollars)
  • Countries with hyperinflation: More acceptable as store of value than local currency
  • Remittances to countries with currency controls: Useful for circumventing restrictions
  • Between consenting parties: Can be used for any agreed-upon barter transaction

Timeline for Bitcoin becoming money: If volatility stabilizes (big if), widespread acceptance develops, and unit-of-account adoption grows, Bitcoin could become money in 20-50 years. But fundamental obstacles (fixed supply meaning price volatility, energy consumption, regulatory hostility in some jurisdictions) may prevent this entirely.

Ethereum: Not Money, But Infrastructure​

Ethereum is not money in any meaningful sense. It's infrastructure—the fuel for the Ethereum network.

What Ethereum is:

  • Infrastructure token: Used for paying transaction fees (gas)
  • Incentive mechanism: Validators earn Ethereum for securing network
  • Speculative asset: Traders buy/sell for profit

Is Ethereum money? No. It's infrastructure. You don't pay for groceries in Ethereum. You don't price goods in Ethereum. Most people can't even use Ethereum directly (requires technical knowledge).

Ethereum's role: More like software or internet protocol than money. It's the medium in which applications run, not the medium of exchange for commerce.

Stablecoins: Actually Functioning as Money​

Stablecoins (USDC, USDT, others) come closest to functioning as money:

Store of value: Excellent (pegged to dollar, stable within 0.1%) Medium of exchange: Growing (especially in crypto-native contexts, emerging markets) Unit of account: Partial (mostly as proxy for dollars, but increasingly independent)

Verdict: Stablecoins are functional money within cryptocurrency ecosystems and in countries with unstable currencies. But they're backed by fiat currency, so they're ultimately derivative of actual money.

Analogy: Stablecoins are like checks or bank transfers (represent actual money, aren't money themselves). The underlying dollars are money; USDC is a representation of dollars.

Government-Issued Fiat Currency: True Money​

Dollars, euros, yen function as actual money:

  • Universal acceptance (legal tender, government backing)
  • Stable value (relatively—inflation is ~2-3% annually, predictable)
  • Unit of account (prices denominated in it)
  • Medium of exchange (use for >80% of transactions)
  • Store of value (good for years, acceptable for decades)

Why the Confusion?​

People often ask "Is Bitcoin money?" because:

  1. Bitcoin is valuable: Something valuable feels like money (but gold is valuable and not money)
  2. Bitcoin is transferable: You can send it to others (but so can stocks, real estate, art)
  3. Bitcoin is divisible: 1 BTC = 100 million Satoshis (fine gradation, like money)
  4. Some accept Bitcoin: You can occasionally pay in Bitcoin (but novelty doesn't make it money)

These properties are money-like, but they're not sufficient for being money. Gold has these properties—it's valuable, transferable, divisible, and some accept it as payment—but it's not money. It's a commodity/store of value.

The Spectrum: From Money to Non-Money​

Perfect money: Government fiat currency (dollars)
↓
Good money with flaws: Euro (good but subject to political risk)
↓
Store of value, limited acceptance: Gold
↓
Growing acceptance, high volatility: Bitcoin
↓
Partial money in crypto contexts: Stablecoins
↓
Infrastructure token: Ethereum
↓
Speculative token: Random altcoins
↓
Complete non-money: Scam tokens, rug pulls

Money exists on a spectrum. Government currency is closest to perfect money. Bitcoin is somewhere in the middle (good store of value, growing but limited acceptance, not a unit of account). Most tokens are not money at all.

Why Bitcoin Isn't Money (Yet, and May Never Be)​

Volatility: 20-50% price swings in weeks make Bitcoin unsuitable for everyday payments (can't price goods in something that changes value 20% per week)

Limited acceptance: <1% of global merchants accept Bitcoin; <0.1% of transactions use it

No unit of account: Nobody prices goods in Bitcoin; all prices are in fiat then converted

Slow settlement: 60+ minute settlement (for security) is too slow for retail transactions (Visa takes seconds)

Regulatory uncertainty: Some countries ban Bitcoin; legal status is uncertain

Complexity: Most people don't understand Bitcoin enough to use it; merchant acceptance requires technical setup

For Bitcoin to be money, these issues would need to resolve. They might over decades, or they might never resolve.

Could Bitcoin Become Money?​

Possible pathways to Bitcoin becoming money:

  1. Extreme currency collapse: If dollars become worthless, Bitcoin becomes relatively attractive
  2. Layer 2 solutions: Lightning Network could enable instant payments (but introduces custodian risk)
  3. Global adoption: If 50%+ of people used Bitcoin, merchants would price in it
  4. Regulatory clarity: Clear legal status increases adoption
  5. Volatility stabilization: If Bitcoin mature and price stabilizes (as % of wealth)

Barriers to Bitcoin becoming money:

  1. Volatility: Inherent to Bitcoin's supply mechanism (fixed supply + demand variation = price swings); may never stabilize
  2. Energy consumption: Political pressure to reduce might limit adoption
  3. User experience: Still too complex for ordinary people
  4. Competition: CBDCs, stablecoins might satisfy demand better
  5. Path dependency: Dollar has enormous network effects; switching costs are high
  6. Regulatory hostility: Some governments will always restrict Bitcoin

The Real Use Cases for Bitcoin (Where It Works)​

Bitcoin works well for:

  • Remittances: Sending money across borders without intermediaries (especially to countries with capital controls)
  • Currency hedging: Alternative to local currency in high-inflation countries (where local currency is losing value)
  • Savings: Long-term store of value (if you believe in Bitcoin's future and can tolerate volatility)
  • Censorship resistance: Transferring value across borders against government wishes
  • Speculation: Trading for profit (if you're comfortable with volatility)
  • Inflation hedge: Protection against fiat currency debasement

Bitcoin doesn't work well for:

  • Everyday payments: Too volatile, too slow, too complex
  • Savings in stable-value currency: Use dollars/stablecoins instead (more stable)
  • Business accounting: Prices fluctuate too much (hard to price goods in Bitcoin)
  • Salary payment: Employer-employee both need certainty (can't accept 30% pay cut if Bitcoin crashes)
  • International payments (stable): Stablecoins work better (stable value)

Real-World Examples​

Mt. Gox (2014): 650,000 Bitcoin lost. If Bitcoin were truly money, this couldn't happen (money is safe). This demonstrates Bitcoin is financial asset held by fallible intermediaries.

El Salvador Adoption (2021): Made Bitcoin legal tender. Adoption has been slower than expected (most businesses convert immediately to dollars). Demonstrates Bitcoin isn't yet accepted as money even when mandated legally.

FTX Collapse (2022): $8 billion in customer crypto lost. Demonstrates crypto custody risk. With government money (FDIC insured), this couldn't happen.

Terra/Luna Collapse (2022): UST stablecoin depegged, Luna token crashed 99%. Demonstrated risks of stablecoins (can fail). True money doesn't crash 99% in weeks.

FAQ: Is Crypto Money?​

Q1: If I can use Bitcoin to buy coffee, isn't it money?

You can occasionally buy coffee with Bitcoin, but that's a novelty. Money requires universal, reliable acceptance. You can't buy coffee most places (~99% of merchants globally). By this logic, Visa gift cards are money (you can buy coffee), but they're not—they're claims on money.

Q2: Is gold money?

No. Gold is a commodity/store of value. It passes #1 and sometimes #2, but fails #3 (prices aren't in grams of gold). Bitcoin has similar status to gold—both are stores of value, neither is money.

Q3: Will Bitcoin eventually become money?

Possibly, but not without fundamental changes. Layer 2 solutions might enable fast payments. Volatility might stabilize (unlikely). Wide adoption might lead to unit-of-account use. But this requires Bitcoin to solve problems it was never designed to solve. 50-year outlook: uncertain.

Q4: Are stablecoins money?

Functionally yes, within cryptocurrency ecosystems and in countries with currency crises. But they're derivative of government money (they're backed by dollars). They're "money substitutes," like checks or bank transfers (which represent actual money).

Q5: Could cryptocurrency replace government money?

Extremely unlikely. Governments would ban it, regulate it, or create their own CBDCs. CBDCs + regulation will probably dominate. Cryptocurrency might exist in parallel, but not replace government money. Government monetary control is too valuable to governments.

Q6: What makes something money vs. just an asset?

Money must serve three functions: store of value, medium of exchange, unit of account. Partial performance is acceptable. Government money passes all three excellently. Bitcoin passes medium of exchange partially; stablecoins pass all three partially.

Summary​

Cryptocurrency's status as "money" is nuanced and requires understanding what money is. Bitcoin functions partially as a store of value (volatile but perceived as valuable) and limited medium of exchange (<1% of transactions), but fails entirely as a unit of account—making it not quite money, more like digital gold or speculative investment. Ethereum is not money at all; it's infrastructure. Stablecoins function as money within cryptocurrency ecosystems and in countries with unstable currencies but are derivative of government money. Government-issued fiat currency (dollars, euros) remains true money, meeting all three functions excellently. Whether cryptocurrency becomes money depends on volatility stabilization, widespread acceptance, and unit-of-account adoption—none of which are guaranteed and some of which may be impossible given Bitcoin's design. For practical purposes, most people should use government money for savings, stablecoins for emerging-market resilience, and Bitcoin only if comfortable with speculation and volatility.

Deeper coverage in Book 18 — Cryptocurrency for Beginners.

Next​

→ Next chapter: Money Psychology