Skip to main content
Other Assets

Geopolitics of commodities

Pomegra Learn

Geopolitics of commodities

Commodity prices are shaped not just by supply and demand but by geopolitics: wars, sanctions, trade disputes, and resource nationalism. Unlike financial assets (stocks, bonds), commodities are physical, immobile (until shipped), and concentrated in specific geographies. This creates leverage: a single country or cartel can restrict supply and move global prices.

OPEC and Oil Hegemony: The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries was founded in 1960 but achieved leverage in 1973 with the oil embargo. OPEC members (Saudi Arabia, Russia informally, Iraq, Iran, Nigeria, et al.) collectively control 40+ percent of global crude production. This concentration is enormous: if OPEC cuts 5 percent of global supply, prices can double. Conversely, if OPEC discipline breaks (members cheating on quotas), prices collapse. OPEC meetings are among the most anticipated market events. A successful production cut announcement can move oil $5–10 per barrel in minutes.

Russia as Swing Producer: Russia is the world's second-largest oil producer and largest natural gas exporter. Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine disrupted global supplies: Western sanctions banned Russian oil exports, cutting 3+ million barrels per day from global supply. Oil surged toward $140, the highest since 2008. European natural gas prices tripled as LNG supplies redirected to Europe (away from Asia). The Ukraine war is a case study in how geopolitical shocks create commodity volatility and leverage prices upward.

Sanctions Regimes: US sanctions on Iran, Russia, and Venezuela have repeatedly disrupted oil markets. When sanctions tighten, oil rises (supply restricted). When sanctions ease, oil falls (supply restored). Sanctions on Russian metals (aluminum, nickel) create volatility in base metals. Sanctions on rare earth exports from China have prompted Western companies to develop alternative supply chains. The politicization of commodity supply creates long-term uncertainty and can justify geopolitical risk premiums in commodity prices.

Rare Earth Concentration: China controls 70+ percent of global rare earth processing (though mining is more diversified). Rare earths are essential for wind turbines, electric vehicle motors, and military equipment. In 2010, China briefly restricted rare earth exports in response to geopolitical disputes, causing global shortages and price spikes. This event prompted renewed focus on supply chain diversification. However, China's cost advantages remain durable, and concentration persists. Rare earths are a genuine geopolitical chokepoint.

Lithium and Cobalt Geography: Lithium supply is concentrated in Chile (40 percent), Argentina, Australia, and China. Cobalt (80+ percent) comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, a politically unstable country with ethical concerns (child labor in cobalt mining). As EV demand surges, these concentrations create leverage. China controls much of lithium and cobalt processing, giving it additional power. Lithium prices spiked 10-fold from 2020–2022 partly due to supply constraints and partly due to geopolitical concentration risk premia. Battery companies and EV makers are now investing in supply chain diversification.

Copper Geography: Copper is more diversified than lithium or cobalt (Chile, Peru, China, Congo, Indonesia), but supply shocks still matter. A mine closure in Peru (due to protests or environmental regulation) can tighten supply. A new Chinese smelter starting operations can flood supply. Copper is used broadly (construction, manufacturing, EVs, renewable energy), so production disruptions affect global real activity.

Food Security and Agricultural Geopolitics: Wheat, corn, and fertilizer supply are concentrated. Russia and Ukraine together supply 30 percent of global wheat. China limits fertilizer exports. The Ukraine invasion caused wheat prices to spike 30+ percent (briefly) before settling slightly higher. Agricultural disruptions from climate events or geopolitical conflict create food security concerns, especially for import-dependent regions. Developing countries that rely on wheat imports faced subsistence-level cost increases.

Trade Wars and Tariffs: The 2018–2019 US-China trade war increased commodity volatility. Tariffs on Chinese goods raised costs; retaliatory tariffs on US agricultural goods pressured farm prices. Trade wars are essentially geopolitical commodity disruptions that create uncertainty about supply and demand.

For investors, geopolitical risk is an asymmetric tail event: most of the time, it's background noise, but occasionally (embargo, war, sanctions, trade war), it moves commodity prices violently. A 5–10 percent commodity allocation can benefit from geopolitical risk as a portfolio insurance element. Commodity prices often spike when stocks and bonds are struggling (recession, risk-off), providing diversification. However, this benefit is unreliable, and relying on commodities as "geopolitical insurance" is speculative.

Articles in this chapter​