Skip to main content
Common passive-investing mistakes

Abandoning the Strategy in Drawdowns

Pomegra Learn

Abandoning the Strategy in Drawdowns

Quick definition: Abandoning the strategy in drawdowns means selling your passive portfolio when markets fall sharply, typically driven by fear and panic, locking in losses and missing the recovery.

Key Takeaways

  • Market drawdowns are permanent features of investing; equities fall 10% roughly every 1–2 years and 20%+ roughly every 5–7 years.
  • Panic selling locks in losses and forces you to buy back higher, compounding the damage and extending your investment timeline.
  • Most bear markets recover within 1–2 years; waiting out the downturns is mathematically and historically the winning strategy.
  • Investors who abandoned passive strategies during 2008, 2020, and other crashes missed substantial subsequent gains by selling at the bottom.
  • Preparing psychologically for drawdowns before they occur makes it vastly easier to hold discipline when emotions surge.

The Inevitability of Drawdowns

Drawdowns—extended periods of losses in your portfolio—are not aberrations in investing. They are features. Anyone who tells you that you can invest for the long term without experiencing significant losses is either selling you something or deluding themselves. The historical record is unambiguous: equity portfolios fall 10% or more about every 1–2 years, fall 20% or more about every 5–7 years, and experience 30%+ drawdowns roughly every 10–15 years. These are statistical norms, not disasters.

A 50% drawdown is not impossible; it happened in 2008–2009 when the S&P 500 fell from peak to trough by 57%. The broad stock market also fell 49% in 1973–1974, 48% in 2000–2002, and 34% in 2020 (though that one recovered in months). If you cannot psychologically stomach a 40–50% drawdown, you should not own an all-stock portfolio. But if you can, the historical rewards are enormous: stocks have returned roughly 10% annually over the past century, far exceeding bonds and cash, precisely because investors tolerate these periodic collapses.

The key insight is this: drawdowns are temporary. Market crashes are permanent only if you sell at the bottom. If you hold through the decline, you own the recovery. The recovery is where the wealth builds. Missing the recovery is far more costly than enduring the decline.

The Damage of Panic Selling

When markets collapse—as they do periodically—fear becomes overwhelming. Your portfolio might lose 20%, 30%, or 50% of its value in weeks or months. The psychological pain is real. Your brain, evolved for immediate survival, screams at you to do something, anything, to stop the pain. Selling your portfolio and moving to cash feels like taking action; it feels like protection. In reality, it is surrendering at the exact wrong moment.

The damage of panic selling is multifaceted. First, you lock in losses. If the market falls 30% and you sell your portfolio, you have crystallized a 30% loss on paper. If you had held, that loss would have been temporary; markets recover. Your sale makes the loss permanent. Second, you are now sitting in cash earning 0–5% annually, while markets rebound 20–40%+ over the next 1–2 years. You miss the recovery. Third, you now face a psychological barrier to re-entering the market. Having sold at the bottom and watched markets rally, you feel foolish. You wait for the next dip to buy back in. But dips are less deep than crashes; you end up buying back in gradually at higher prices than you sold. You have successfully bought high and sold low—the opposite of what you intended.

Research by Vanguard and others has quantified this damage. Investors who panic-sold during the 2008–2009 financial crisis and sat in cash until 2011 or 2012 missed roughly 100%+ of returns compared to those who stayed invested. Someone who abandoned a 60/40 portfolio in March 2009 (the bottom) and moved to cash would have missed a gain of over $200,000 if they had invested $500,000 and held. The cost of that panic sale—just a couple of months of emotional pain—was hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The 2020 COVID crash offers another stark example. The market fell about 34% in weeks. Investors who panic-sold in March 2020 crystallized those losses. But by December 2020 (just 9 months later), the market had recovered and surged to record highs. Those who held made a full recovery plus gains. Those who sold and later bought back in lost not only the recovery but also the gains beyond.

Historical Drawdowns and Recoveries

To build conviction in your strategy, study history. The stock market has crashed repeatedly, and every single crash has recovered and gone on to new highs. This is not optimism; it is historical fact.

1987: The "Black Monday" crash wiped 22% in a single day. Terrifying at the time. By the end of 1987, the market had recovered most losses. Within two years, new highs.

2000–2002: The dot-com bubble burst; the Nasdaq fell 78% and the S&P 500 fell 49%. Investors who sold in 2002 missed the subsequent bull market from 2003–2007, which more than doubled their money.

2008–2009: The financial crisis triggered a 57% decline in the S&P 500. Those who panic-sold missed a recovery that delivered 30% annual gains from 2009–2012.

2020: COVID crash fell 34% in weeks. Recovery took only 5 months. Those who held or bought the dip made outsized gains.

These are not rare anomalies. They are the expected pattern. The lesson: downturns hurt in the moment but are temporary. Selling during downturns converts temporary pain into permanent loss of wealth.

The Mathematics of Recovery

The math of recoveries illustrates why selling is so destructive. If your portfolio falls 50%, it must rise 100% to break even. If it falls 40%, it must rise 67% to recover. But markets do more than recover; they typically deliver 7–10% annual returns on average. After a 50% crash, it takes roughly 7–10 years for a portfolio to get back to all-time highs—assuming no panic selling and no additional investment. During that recovery period, your portfolio is not just flat; it is climbing significantly. Those who hold miss none of this. Those who sold miss the entire 7–10 year rally that restores wealth and then builds beyond.

Consider a concrete example: $500,000 invested in a diversified passive portfolio in January 2008. By March 2009, it had fallen to roughly $215,000 (a 57% loss). An investor who panic-sold at that point locked in that loss. If instead they held, by the end of 2019 (11 years later), that $215,000 would have grown back to roughly $630,000—a 193% gain from the bottom, despite the initial 57% loss. The panic-seller still had $215,000 sitting in cash earning almost nothing. The disciplined holder had $630,000.

Preparing Mentally for the Next Drawdown

The best defense against panic selling is preparation. Before the next crash—and there will be a next crash—decide in advance how you will respond. Write it down. Commit to it. Here are the key steps:

First, acknowledge that a 30–50% drawdown will happen at least once in your investing lifetime. Expect it. Know it is coming. This mental preparation prevents the shock and panic when it arrives.

Second, do the math. Calculate how much your portfolio will fall in a worst-case scenario. If you have $500,000 invested and a crash drops your portfolio 50%, you will have $250,000. Can you tolerate that? If the answer is no, you are overexposed to stocks and should reduce your equity allocation now, before the crash. If the answer is yes, write it down: "I can tolerate a $250,000 loss because I know it is temporary and recoveries have always happened."

Third, commit to a rebalancing rule, not a market-timing rule. Your rule should say something like: "I will not sell during market declines. Instead, I will rebalance annually by adding new capital to the asset classes that have fallen the most." This turns a natural market decline into a buying opportunity, not a selling crisis.

Fourth, disconnect emotionally from daily performance. Stop checking your portfolio balance during crashes. Check it quarterly or annually, not daily. The more frequently you monitor, the more you panic. Research shows investors who check portfolios daily are far more likely to panic-sell than those who check quarterly.

Fifth, lean on your advisory team or a trusted advisor. If you have a financial advisor, use them. Their job is to talk you off the panic-selling ledge. If you do not have an advisor, find an accountability partner—a friend or family member—who will reinforce your long-term strategy when fear strikes.

How it flows

Next

The third mistake is overcomplicating your portfolio with too many holdings, thinking complexity creates better outcomes when simplicity actually delivers superior results.