Emerging Market Classification
Emerging Market Classification
Quick definition: Emerging market classification is the process by which index providers determine which countries qualify as "emerging" (typically developing economies with growth potential) versus "developed" (mature, stable economies), a categorization that directly determines index membership for all securities in those countries.
Key Takeaways
- Index providers like MSCI use multifactor frameworks combining GDP per capita, market maturity, free-float availability, and governance standards to classify countries as developed, emerging, or frontier
- Reclassification of a country from emerging to developed (or frontier to emerging) triggers massive index shifts as billions of dollars of fund flows reposition
- A country's path to developed market status is often incremental, involving intermediate "watch list" designations that signal upcoming changes
- The classification decision is binary at the country level but affects thousands of individual companies, making it one of the largest structural shifts in global indexing
- Understanding country classification helps investors anticipate which emerging markets are candidates for "graduation" and prepare for the index flows that graduation triggers
MSCI's Country Classification Framework
MSCI, the dominant provider of emerging market indices, uses a rigorous country classification methodology that determines the index status of every security in every country. The classification is not based on income level alone. Instead, MSCI combines multiple factors:
- Economic development: GDP per capita, GDP trend, and economic diversification
- Market size: Total market capitalization and size of the largest companies
- Market liquidity: Average trading volumes, bid-ask spreads, and trading value as a percentage of market cap
- Market accessibility: Foreign investment restrictions, trading hours, settlement procedures, and currency convertibility
- Regulatory quality: Ease of capital repatriation, corporate governance standards, and accounting transparency
- Institutional infrastructure: Number and quality of custodians, brokers, and settlement systems
Using this multifactor framework, MSCI designates countries into three tiers:
- Developed Markets: Mature, stable economies with deep, liquid capital markets and strong regulatory infrastructure (e.g., United States, Japan, Germany, Canada)
- Emerging Markets: Developing economies with meaningful growth potential and increasingly accessible capital markets (e.g., Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, Taiwan)
- Frontier Markets: Smaller, less liquid markets with lower development indicators and less accessible regulatory regimes (e.g., Vietnam, Romania, Kenya)
Securities in developed markets go into indices like MSCI USA or MSCI EAFE. Securities in emerging markets go into MSCI Emerging Markets. Securities in frontier markets go into MSCI Frontier Markets (or, until recently, into a subindex).
The Path to Developed Market Status
Countries don't jump overnight from frontier to developed status. The typical path involves multiple stages. A frontier market might first be added to the MSCI EM Frontier Index. After improving market infrastructure and liberalizing foreign investment rules, it might graduate to the main MSCI Emerging Markets index. Years or decades later, as it matures further, it might be considered for "developed market" status.
South Korea provides a historical example of this progression. Korea was classified as a frontier market in the 1990s, then moved to emerging markets in 1992. For 30 years, it remained in emerging markets despite having become one of the world's most developed economies. Finally, in 2023, MSCI reclassified South Korea to "developed market" status, a recognition of the country's economic maturity and the full liberalization of its capital markets.
Taiwan followed a similar (though delayed) path. Despite being one of the world's most technologically advanced countries, Taiwan remained classified as an emerging market for decades due to political considerations and concerns about capital controls. In 2023, MSCI also upgraded Taiwan to developed market status, driven partly by increasing political consensus on the country's openness.
The announcement of a country's pending graduation to developed status typically occurs months before implementation. MSCI publishes its decision, explains the reasoning, and provides a transition period for funds to reposition. During this period, savvy traders position for the expected flows.
The Massive Index Flows from Reclassification
When a country is reclassified from emerging to developed status, the index flows are enormous. Consider what happened when South Korea was upgraded in 2023:
All MSCI Emerging Markets index funds had to sell their Korean stocks. All MSCI Developed Markets (or regional developed indices) had to buy Korean stocks. The Korean securities that were being removed from emerging indices were simultaneously being added to developed indices. The net effect was that Korean stocks remained largely held by the same passive investors but through different funds, yet the trading activity and price impact could be significant.
The magnitude of these flows depends on the size of the market being reclassified. When a major market is reclassified, the flows can be measured in hundreds of billions of dollars. In the case of South Korea, estimated flows exceeded $100 billion as funds repositioned. This massive, predictable move creates an opportunity for traders: buy Korean equities before the reclassification is implemented, knowing that passive index flows will drive prices higher.
History shows that countries being upgraded from emerging to developed status often experience positive price momentum in the weeks before reclassification, driven by front-running of index flows. Conversely, countries being downgraded (much rarer) experience negative pressure.
Watch List and Multiple-Step Graduations
Not all reclassifications are direct jumps. MSCI often places a country on a "Watch List" to signal that it is being considered for reclassification but hasn't yet qualified. South Korea and Taiwan spent years on the MSCI developed markets watch list before official reclassification.
The watch list serves multiple purposes. It alerts market participants to the possibility of reclassification, allowing them to prepare. It gives countries an opportunity to address remaining issues (regulatory reforms, market infrastructure improvements) that might be holding back official reclassification. It gives the market time to gradually prepare for the potential shift.
For passive investors, watch list designation is a yellow flag. It suggests that reclassification might be coming within 1–3 years. Smart investors begin monitoring the country's progress toward meeting developed market criteria.
Reverse Reclassifications and Frontier Movements
While most attention focuses on emerging-to-developed reclassifications, countries can also move in the opposite direction. Reclassifications downward are rare but do occur. If a country experiences a major political crisis, imposes capital controls, or deteriorates on multiple MSCI metrics, it can be downgraded from emerging to frontier status.
Similarly, frontier markets can be upgraded to emerging status. Vietnam has been tracked as a potential emerging market candidate, though its path has been slower than some expected due to concerns about political openness and capital controls.
These reverse reclassifications create different investor dynamics than upgrades. Downgrades are typically negative for equities in the affected country, as they signal weakening fundamentals and reduced investment appeal. Upgrades from frontier to emerging are positive, similar to emerging-to-developed upgrades, as they signal improving market quality.
Geographic Concentration and Reclassification Timing
Reclassification timing can concentrate index flows in specific regions. The 2023 reclassification of both South Korea and Taiwan happened in the same quarter, creating a massive shift in Asia-related index flows. Funds that track Asia-focused indices had to make significant changes. This concentration of reclassification events is somewhat accidental but can have outsized impact on regional markets.
Future reclassifications will likely involve Middle Eastern markets. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have invested heavily in capital market infrastructure and liberalized foreign investment rules. Both countries are candidates for potential emerging market reclassification if they continue on their current trajectory. When (and if) either country is upgraded, the index flows will be substantial.
Process
Next
Within emerging markets themselves, the inclusion of specific security types like Chinese A-shares has become another major classification frontier for index providers.