Skip to main content

Charts in the News

Charts are meant to clarify data, but they can deceive if the reader doesn't understand what they're showing. A chart's Y-axis can be scaled to make small changes look dramatic or large changes look negligible. Time ranges can be cherry-picked to support a narrative. Logarithmic and linear scales tell different stories from the same data. Financial articles use charts to make arguments visually, and learning to read them critically is essential.

The most basic chart manipulation is Y-axis manipulation. If a stock trades between $95 and $105 over a month, a chart with a Y-axis starting at $0 will make the move look tiny and meaningless. The same chart with a Y-axis from $90 to $110 will make the move look significant. Both charts show the same data; they just frame it differently. Financial news articles often use narrow Y-axis ranges to make movements appear more dramatic, especially when covering market declines or asset volatility.

Time Window Selection​

The time period shown in a chart fundamentally changes the story. A company's stock price over the last month might be rallying dramatically while over the last five years it's been flat or declining. A bond yield that has spiked recently might be returning to historical norms. A chart showing the last month can be honest while a chart showing the last five years tells a different honest story about the same investment.

Financial media frequently uses time-window selection to support narratives. A bullish article about an asset might show a five-year uptrend while a bearish article about the same asset over the same period might show a one-year decline. This isn't always deceptive—both charts can be accurate representations of real data—but it's highly selective.

The most honest approach to time windows is showing multiple timeframes: the last month, last year, and last five years. This prevents cherry-picking and gives readers multiple perspectives. Articles that show only one time window are either being selective or don't have the space for multiple views. Noticing which time window is chosen helps you evaluate how selective the presentation is.

Logarithmic Versus Linear Scales​

Stock price charts can be displayed on a linear scale (where each grid line represents an equal dollar amount) or logarithmic scale (where each grid line represents an equal percentage change). Over long periods with large price changes, log scales show clearer pictures of percentage movements while linear scales can make early movements disappear into the baseline.

A stock rising from $10 to $20 over ten years is a 100% return. If the stock then rises from $20 to $40 in one year, that's another 100% return. On a linear scale, the second move appears much larger because the dollar amount is larger. On a log scale, both moves appear equivalent because they represent equal percentage changes. Financial news articles almost never specify which scale they're using, leaving readers guessing about the true shape of movements.

Comparing Different Assets​

A particularly tricky chart type shows multiple assets on the same chart to suggest comparisons. A chart showing three stock indices on the same Y-axis can be misleading if the indices have very different price levels. An index trading at 4,000 and one at 100 will look wildly different in terms of volatility on the same scale, even if the percentage movements are identical. Using dual-axis charts (separate Y-axes for each index) prevents this distortion, but it's more complex to read.

Financial articles sometimes compare very different assets—stocks versus bonds, dollars versus commodities—on the same chart. These comparisons are only meaningful if the movements are expressed as percentages or if dual axes are used. Otherwise, the chart is comparing apples and oranges visually.

A chart showing an uptrend can be reframed by starting the data from a different point. The stock market has been in a long-term uptrend since 2009, but a chart starting in early 2022 (near the peak before a decline) would show a downtrend instead. Both are accurate representations; they just use different starting points.

Financial articles sometimes use this technique intentionally, sometimes unintentionally. A bearish article might show a chart starting from a cyclical peak to emphasize decline. A bullish article might show a chart starting from a cyclical trough to emphasize recovery. The same price movement can be framed as either disappointing decline or impressive recovery depending on the starting point.

Color, Annotation, and Emotional Framing​

Beyond axes and time windows, charts are also framed through color choices and annotations. Red is commonly used for declines and green for gains, which biases emotional interpretation. A chart with heavy red coloring and dramatic annotations ("Sharp Sell-Off") conveys more negative emotion than a chart of the same data presented neutrally.

Annotations on charts—arrows, callouts, trend lines—guide reader interpretation. An annotation saying "Unsustainable Peak" frames a price movement as temporary before it's proven otherwise. These annotations are the chart designer's interpretation of what the data means, not the data itself.

Building Visual Literacy​

Reading charts critically means asking: What exactly is being measured on each axis? What time period is shown? Why was this period chosen? What would the chart look like with a different time period? Are multiple assets on the same chart using the same scale? Is the scale linear or logarithmic?

These questions won't make you immune to chart manipulation, but they make you conscious of how charts can be distorted. Once you start asking these questions, you'll notice that financial articles often skip answering them. A deeper understanding comes from looking at the underlying data when you don't trust the chart's framing.

Articles in this chapter​