Skip to main content

Services offshoring explained

When you call your bank's customer service line, there's a chance you're speaking to someone in India, the Philippines, or Mexico. When a company needs to process invoices or do accounting work, it might send that work to a business process outsourcing (BPO) firm in Bangalore. When a software company needs to build a feature, it might contract with a firm in Eastern Europe or India. The offshoring of services—work that can be done remotely, over the internet or phone—is a more recent phenomenon than manufacturing offshoring, but it's growing fast and affecting a different set of workers: those in middle-skill, white-collar jobs.

Quick definition: Services offshoring is the relocation of service work (software development, customer service, accounting, data entry) from rich countries to lower-wage countries, enabled by telecommunications and internet technology.

Services offshoring is conceptually the same as manufacturing offshoring—moving production to where labour is cheaper—but it differs in important ways. Services don't require physical proximity to consumers in all cases. A customer service representative in Manila can serve US customers just as well as one in Atlanta. However, services are not tradeable goods: you can't stack a customer service call on a container ship. Services require telecommunication links and real-time or near-real-time interaction.

This creates different constraints than manufacturing. Some services can't be offshored because they require physical presence (haircuts, plumbing, surgery). Others can be offshored but face cultural or language barriers (legal services, medical services). Some face political and regulatory restrictions. But a growing category of services—back-office work, software development, customer support—can be and are increasingly offshored.

Key takeaways​

  • Services offshoring began in the 1990s and accelerated in the 2000s as internet bandwidth improved and service-sector wages in developing countries remained low
  • Major categories include IT services, business process outsourcing (BPO), accounting, and customer service
  • India became the dominant destination due to English proficiency, large supply of educated workers, and government support; other countries (Philippines, Vietnam, Eastern Europe) also expanded
  • Services offshoring affects a different demographic than manufacturing: more educated, white-collar workers
  • Effects include job losses and wage pressure for customer service, accounting, and IT workers in rich countries
  • However, services offshoring is smaller in scale than manufacturing offshoring and affects a smaller share of the workforce
  • Political backlash against services offshoring is less intense than against manufacturing offshoring, partly because service workers are less unionised

How services offshoring emerged​

Manufacturing offshoring was already underway in the 1980s-90s when technology enabled services to be offshored. The critical enabler was the internet and telecommunications. In the 1990s, international telephone calls cost $2-5 per minute; video calls weren't possible. By the 2010s, international calls were effectively free, and high-bandwidth internet connections enabled video, file transfers, and remote work.

India was the first major destination for services offshoring, and it remains the largest. Why India?

Large supply of English-speaking workers: India was colonised by Britain and maintained English as a lingua franca among the educated and, increasingly, among the broader population. This is critical because many offshored services require English fluency. A customer service representative who doesn't speak English fluently is useless; an accountant who misunderstands English instructions makes errors.

Large supply of educated workers: India has a massive education system producing millions of graduates annually. In the 1990s-2000s, many educated Indians faced limited job opportunities at home; salaries for engineers and accountants were low. A software engineer in Bangalore could earn $2,000 per month, compared to $50,000-100,000 per year in the US. The wage differential was enormous and persistent.

Government support: The Indian government actively promoted IT services, establishing special economic zones, tax breaks, and infrastructure investments. Companies like Infosys, Wipro, and Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) grew into giants on the back of government support and access to cheap labour. Industry data is tracked by the World Bank and OECD in their service trade databases.

First-mover advantage: India moved first; by the time other countries tried to compete, India had developed supply chains, reputation, and infrastructure. A company wanting to offshore IT work in 2000 had few options; by 2020, India was the obvious choice.

The Philippines emerged as a second major destination, particularly for customer service and voice work. The Philippines' large English-speaking population and lower wages than India made it attractive for customer service outsourcing (BPO). Vietnam, Romania, and other countries also developed significant outsourcing hubs.

Major categories of services offshoring​

IT services and software development​

This is the largest category. American and European software companies hire developers, architects, and testers in India, Eastern Europe, and other countries. A company might keep senior developers and architects in the US (designing architecture, making key decisions) and hire developers in India and Romania for implementation and testing.

The scale is enormous. In 2000, there were about 25,000 Indian IT service workers. By 2020, there were over 4 million. Companies like Infosys and TCS have become multinational giants with tens of thousands of employees serving US and European clients.

The impact on US software workers is mixed. Some software jobs were lost directly to offshoring. However, the software industry overall grew enormously; demand for software grew faster than offshoring would shrink employment. Additionally, US firms using cheaper offshore developers could expand, lower prices, and grow market share, offsetting some job losses. Most economists conclude that while some US software workers faced wage pressure and displacement, the software sector's overall growth muted the negative effect.

Business process outsourcing (BPO)​

BPO includes customer service, accounting, payroll processing, data entry, and other back-office work. A bank might hire customer service representatives in the Philippines; an accounting firm might hire accountants in India; a retailer might hire data-entry workers in Romania.

The scale of BPO is large. In the Philippines, hundreds of thousands of workers are employed in call centres serving US, European, and Australian clients. In India, millions work in BPO.

The impact on home-country workers is more negative than for IT services. Customer service jobs in the US paid $25,000-35,000 per year; similar work in the Philippines pays $3,000-5,000 per year. The wage differential encourages offshoring. US employment in customer service has declined since 2000, partly due to offshoring, partly due to automation (interactive voice response systems, chatbots).

Financial services back-office​

Insurance companies, banks, and investment firms offshore back-office work: claims processing, trade settlement, accounting, reconciliation. A US bank might have teams in India handling routine operations (regulated by the Federal Reserve and SEC). The work requires accuracy but limited judgment, making it easy to offshore.

Engineering and design​

Some engineering firms offshore detailed design and drafting work. An architecture firm in the US might have architects in the US designing buildings, but architectural technicians in India or the Philippines doing the detailed CAD work. Similarly, mechanical engineers sometimes offshore detailed engineering drawings to lower-wage countries.

This affects a smaller number of workers but affects those with more education and higher earnings. An engineer earning $80,000 affected by offshoring has more earning potential and greater ability to retrain than a customer service worker, but the shock is sharper because the wage loss is larger.

These have not offshored as much as other services, due to regulatory and cultural barriers. A company can't legally move medical services offshore (telemedicine is emerging but is regulated). Legal services are also limited, though offshore firms do write contracts and do legal research. However, these sectors employ fewer people and are less sensitive to wage competition, so offshoring in these sectors is limited.

The impact on workers in rich countries​

Services offshoring affects a different demographic than manufacturing offshoring. Service workers tend to be more educated (high school plus some college or vocational training, sometimes a bachelor's degree) but less unionised. The effects mirror manufacturing offshoring but differ in magnitude and distribution.

Job losses​

Not as large in absolute numbers as manufacturing, but significant in relative terms. Customer service employment in the US fell from about 2 million in 2000 to 1.5 million by 2020. Some of this is automation (automated phone systems), some is offshoring. Data entry jobs fell similarly.

Accounting employment fell from about 1.4 million in 2000 to 1.2 million by 2020, again due to a combination of automation and offshoring.

Software and IT jobs are complex: employment fell in some categories (IT operations, network administration) but grew in others (software development, data science). The net effect is mixed, with wage stagnation for mid-level IT workers but growth for senior roles.

Wage pressure​

Wage growth for customer service representatives slowed; nominal wages stagnated, meaning real wages fell. The supply of customer service workers increased (partly due to immigrants willing to do the work, partly due to offshoring removing alternatives), reducing bargaining power. Workers in customer service positions saw wages of $25,000-30,000 in 2000; by 2020, inflation-adjusted wages had fallen to $20,000-25,000 in many cases.

For IT workers, wage growth slowed for mid-level workers but continued for senior workers and architects. The effect was widening inequality within the IT sector: senior engineers and architects (who could not be easily replaced by offshore workers) saw wage growth; junior programmers and IT operations workers faced pressure.

Geographic effects​

Unlike manufacturing offshoring, which affected specific regions (textile belt, Midwest), services offshoring affected urban areas nationwide. Large cities with significant financial, IT, and professional services sectors (New York, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago) saw some job losses but also continued growth as companies using offshore workers reinvested savings into other areas.

Smaller cities and rural areas, less dependent on service outsourcing, saw less impact.

Demographic effects​

Services offshoring hit workers with some college education or IT certifications—workers who were neither high-school dropouts (most vulnerable to automation) nor college graduates (more insulated from competition). These are workers who had built expectations of steady middle-class incomes and faced disruption.

The scale of services offshoring​

Services offshoring is real but smaller in scale than manufacturing offshoring or automation. Estimates suggest that services offshoring accounts for 5-10% of service-sector employment decline since 2000, with automation accounting for 30-40% and other factors (industry shifts, demand changes) accounting for the remainder.

By sector:

  • Customer service: 10-15% of employment growth has been offshored; automation has eliminated more jobs than offshoring
  • Accounting: 5-10% of employment decline is due to offshoring; automation and consolidation account for more
  • IT services: more complex; some IT roles offshored, others created; net is roughly zero to slightly positive
  • Engineering: 5-10% of detailed design work offshored; core engineering remains in high-wage countries

The smaller scale reflects both constraints (you can't offshore face-to-face services) and comparative advantage (the US remains the world leader in high-skill services; offshoring is limited to routine or detail work).

The developing-country perspective​

Services offshoring was transformative for countries like India. In 1991, India's software exports were under $100 million annually. By 2020, they exceeded $100 billion. This growth employed millions: engineers, accountants, quality assurance specialists, and support staff.

For individual workers, services offshoring provided opportunities. An engineer in India earning $20,000 per year (high for India) serving US clients was doing vastly better than peers working domestically. As companies like Infosys and TCS grew, they became prestigious employers with international standards.

However, services offshoring creates different challenges than manufacturing:

Wage stagnation in high-demand sectors​

As millions of engineers were trained in India to serve offshore work, wages stagnated. An engineer in Bangalore earning $20,000 in 2005 was earning $25,000 in 2015 (in nominal terms; in real terms, inflation meant declining living standards). The supply of trained workers grew faster than domestic demand, keeping wages low.

Brain drain​

Talented workers migrate to the US or other rich countries for higher wages. Many engineers trained through Indian IT firms later migrated to Silicon Valley. This is economically good for individuals but represents a loss of talent from India.

Vulnerability to economic cycles and wage competition​

If the US economy slows, demand for IT services falls, and Indian firms face reduced demand. Additionally, as wages rose in India, other countries (Vietnam, Philippines, Romania) offered cheaper alternatives. Indian firms had to move up the value chain, doing more sophisticated work, rather than competing on cost.

Narrow range of opportunities​

Services offshoring concentrated employment in specific sectors and cities (Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune). Other parts of India saw less benefit. Workers trained for offshoring work were sometimes not suited to other industries, creating vulnerability.

Common mistakes about services offshoring​

Mistake 1: Overstating the scope​

Services offshoring gets disproportionate media attention. A news story about call centres moving to India makes headlines; the gradual automation of customer service (which eliminated more jobs) gets less attention. While services offshoring is real, it's smaller in scale than automation and smaller than manufacturing offshoring. Total US services employment has grown despite offshoring, whereas manufacturing employment fell significantly.

Mistake 2: Assuming all services can be offshored​

Most services can't be offshored because they require physical presence (healthcare, construction, retail, hospitality, transportation, education). These sectors, which employ the majority of workers, are largely immune to offshoring. A haircut, a medical appointment, or restaurant meal can't be delivered from India.

Mistake 3: Ignoring quality and cultural factors​

Offshored services often face quality challenges. Customer service representatives speaking English as a second language may misunderstand customers. Engineers in different time zones may have slow communication with architects. Cultural differences in problem-solving and communication can create friction. These factors limit offshoring scope and explain why companies maintain some functions domestically.

Mistake 4: Treating services offshoring as identical to manufacturing offshoring​

Services offshoring requires telecommunications infrastructure; manufacturing offshoring requires shipping infrastructure. Services offshoring affects white-collar workers; manufacturing offshoring affected blue-collar workers. The wage gaps differ (less extreme for services), the regional impacts differ (less concentrated for services), and the political backlash differs (quieter for services, partly because white-collar workers are less unionised).

Mistake 5: Ignoring the growth in service demand​

Service-sector employment has grown in rich countries despite offshoring. This is because demand for services grew faster than offshoring could move jobs. Healthcare, education, entertainment, and personalised services all grew. As incomes rise, demand for services rises, partially offsetting offshoring job losses.

FAQ​

Why doesn't automation eliminate more service jobs than offshoring?​

Automation does eliminate more jobs; it's the larger effect. However, automation also creates some new jobs (maintaining systems, developing algorithms, analysing data). Offshoring does not create new job categories; it just moves jobs. This matters politically: automation's job displacement is diffuse and slower (giving workers time to adapt); offshoring's displacement is concentrated and faster, making it politically visible.

Could India maintain its offshoring advantage as wages rise?​

Yes and no. As Indian wages rise (they've been rising about 6-7% annually), the wage advantage over rich countries shrinks. However, India can maintain competitive advantage by moving to higher-value services (management consulting, strategy, complex software architecture) where the wage gap is less critical and India has developed expertise and reputation. However, India will likely lose routine offshoring to lower-wage countries as wages rise.

Is remote work making offshoring less necessary?​

Possibly. If companies can hire remote workers in the US at lower wages than office workers, or hire talented workers globally, the need to offshore to save labour costs declines. However, wage differences remain: a software engineer in Bangalore still costs less than an equivalent engineer in San Francisco. Remote work may reduce offshoring slightly but won't eliminate it.

What happens to offshored workers when companies move to even lower-wage countries?​

Workers in the first-mover countries (India, Philippines) face unemployment or must move to different sectors or cities. Some move to higher-value services; some exit the labour force. Migration from low-wage to high-wage cities within the country is common. This mirrors the experience of manufacturing-dependent regions as production shifted to even lower-wage countries.

Should governments restrict services offshoring?​

This is a political economy question. Tariffs on services are difficult (you can't put a tariff on a customer service call). Restrictions would require preventing companies from hiring foreigners, which is protectionist. Some countries (France, for example) have tried to encourage "insourcing" through subsidies or restrictions, with limited success. The economic case against restriction is that it raises costs for companies and consumers; the political case for restriction is that it protects workers.

Are some services offshoring benefits lost due to quality issues?​

Partially. Some companies tried to offshore customer service and found quality problems leading to customer complaints and losses. They brought some functions back or hired offshore staff in the home country. Others optimised offshoring for commodity services (basic inquiries) and kept complex services domestically. Quality issues limit but don't eliminate offshoring.

Summary​

Services offshoring—the relocation of back-office, customer service, and software development work to lower-wage countries, primarily India—emerged in the 1990s-2000s as telecommunications improved and enabled remote work. It has affected millions of workers in customer service, accounting, IT operations, and data entry, creating wage pressure and job losses in rich countries. However, services offshoring is smaller in scale than manufacturing offshoring or automation, and many service sectors (healthcare, construction, education) can't be offshored. For developing countries like India, services offshoring created enormous employment opportunities and drove economic growth, though wage gains have moderated as supply expanded. Understanding services offshoring requires recognising both its real labour-market effects and its limits: most service work remains local, and demand for services continues growing in rich countries despite some offshoring.

Next​

→ Supply chain basics for investors