Skip to main content

What Are Discouraged Workers?

Discouraged workers are people who want a job but have stopped actively searching because they believe no suitable employment is available. They have given up. The unemployment rate only counts people actively job-hunting; it excludes those who have exited the labor force entirely. Discouraged workers sit in the gap between the official unemployment statistics and the true number of people who would work if conditions were different. A recession can create millions of discouraged workers—people who send résumés without response, attend interviews without success, or simply exhaust their savings and stop trying. In good economic times, many return to job-hunting and find work. But in severe, prolonged downturns (like 2008–2009 or the 1980s recession), discouraged workers can persist for years. The question of how many discouraged workers exist, and whether they should be counted in unemployment, has profound implications for how we measure economic slack and set monetary policy. If official unemployment is 4% but millions of discouraged workers exist, is the labor market truly tight?

Quick definition: Discouraged workers are people who have stopped actively job-searching because they believe no jobs exist for them, causing them to be excluded from the official unemployment rate but counted in broader underemployment measures.

Key takeaways​

  • Discouraged workers are excluded from the official unemployment rate (U-3) because they're not actively searching, but they are counted in broader measures like U-5 and U-6.
  • Discouraged-worker counts spike during recessions and fall slowly during recoveries, reflecting structural barriers to employment.
  • The Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks discouraged workers in the Current Population Survey; in early 2024, roughly 400,000–600,000 people were discouraged.
  • Labor force participation rates have fallen partly due to discouragement, making the official unemployment rate potentially misleading as an indicator of economic slack.
  • Reasons for discouragement vary: age (older workers face discrimination), education (those without high school diplomas struggle), race (Black workers face persistent barriers), health, and geographic isolation.
  • Policy responses—including job training, wage subsidies, and wage floors—aim to bring discouraged workers back into the labor force.

How Discouraged Workers Are Classified​

The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines discouraged workers as a subset of what it calls "marginally attached to the labor force." These are people who have looked for work in the past 12 months but not in the past 4 weeks. Within this group, discouraged workers specifically are those who did not search in the past 4 weeks because they believe no suitable job is available for them. This is distinct from other reasons people might stop searching (attending school, family obligations, disability, retirement).

To capture discouraged workers, the BLS uses the Current Population Survey (CPS), the same monthly household survey that generates the official unemployment rate. In addition to the main CPS questions, the BLS asks a supplementary question to those not in the labor force: "What is the main reason you were not looking for work in the past 4 weeks?" Respondents can select from a list including "could not find a job," "lacks necessary schooling or training," "unable to work due to disability," "has caring responsibilities," "school or training," or others. Those who answer "could not find a job" are classified as discouraged.

This classification reveals a key challenge: discouraged workers are difficult to count accurately. The question relies on self-reporting about subjective states (belief, hope, discouragement). A worker might say they stopped searching because they "couldn't find a job" when they actually stopped because they face childcare barriers or transportation issues. Conversely, someone might be unemployed and searching actively while feeling subjectively discouraged about prospects. The BLS does its best, but measurement error is inherent.

The BLS publishes discouraged worker counts in its Alternative Measures of Labor Underutilization, often labeled U-4 through U-6:

  • U-3: The official unemployment rate (unemployed plus labor force participants actively searching).
  • U-4: U-3 plus discouraged workers, divided by the labor force plus discouraged workers.
  • U-5: U-3 plus marginally attached (all those who stopped searching in the past 4 weeks, not just discouraged).
  • U-6: U-3 plus marginally attached plus part-time workers who want full-time work (the broadest measure).

When unemployment is low but economists worry about hidden slack, they look at U-5 and U-6. A 3.5% U-3 with a 5.5% U-6 suggests significant hidden underutilization.

Why Discouraged Workers Matter​

Discouraged workers reveal a critical gap between the official unemployment statistics and the true pool of potential workers. If the labor force simply reflected everyone who wanted to work, labor force participation would be stable or predictable. Instead, participation fluctuates with economic conditions. During recessions, when job-hunting becomes futile for many, participation falls as workers give up. During booms, participation rises as discouraged workers re-enter the search.

This has two major implications:

First, the unemployment rate is cyclically biased. When recessions hit, unemployment first rises (employed people lose jobs). But after a while, as job-hunting yields nothing, many unemployed workers transition to discouraged status and exit the labor force. The official unemployment rate then falls, even though no net job creation may have occurred. The jobless person simply dropped out of the statistics. This makes unemployment a lagging indicator of the true employment situation.

To illustrate: in the 2008–2009 recession, unemployment peaked at 10% in October 2009. But during the same period, labor force participation fell from 65.7% to 64.7%, a decline representing roughly 1.5 million people exiting the labor force. Many of these were likely discouraged. If these exited workers were reclassified as unemployed, the peak unemployment rate would have been higher. The official statistics understated the severity.

Second, discouragement makes monetary policy harder to calibrate. The Federal Reserve targets a notion of "maximum employment," which is often operationalized as an unemployment rate corresponding to stable inflation (the NAIRU, or Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment, typically estimated around 4–4.5%). But if the true slack in the labor market is larger than the unemployment rate suggests—because millions are discouraged—then the economy may have more room to grow without inflation than the headline rate implies. Conversely, if discouraged workers are plentiful, the Fed might cut rates when it should tighten, overheating the economy.

The Long-Term Decline in Labor Force Participation​

One of the most striking economic trends of the past 20 years has been the decline in labor force participation. In 2000, roughly 67% of the working-age population (16–65) was either employed or actively searching for work. By 2020, this had fallen to 61%, and even after pandemic-era rebounds, it remains around 63% as of 2024. This is a massive shift, representing millions of people who have exited the labor force entirely.

Discouraged workers are part of this story, though not all of it. Aging Baby Boomers retiring accounts for much of the decline. Disability rates have risen slightly. More people are enrolled in school. But surveys and research suggest that discouragement—the belief that jobs are unavailable—has played a non-trivial role.

This is especially true for certain demographic groups:

Older workers (55+). Labor force participation among men over 65 has declined from 18% in 2000 to 12% today. Some of this is voluntary retirement, but some reflects employer discrimination against older workers. Older workers report higher discouragement rates; they often struggle to find work after displacement.

Men with less than a high school education. Labor force participation among men without a high school diploma has plummeted from 75% in 1980 to below 60% by 2020. Many have exited due to disability, opioid addiction, or criminal records, but surveys indicate discouragement is also a factor.

Black workers. Black unemployment rates are consistently higher than white unemployment rates (often 1.5–2x as high), which can translate into higher discouragement rates. Persistent discrimination in hiring and promotion likely contributes.

Prime-age women in some regions. While overall female labor force participation has stabilized, participation in some regions has declined, partly due to childcare barriers and partly due to discouragement in areas with limited job diversity.

Discouragement Across the Business Cycle​

Discouraged-worker counts follow a predictable cyclical pattern. During recessions, discouragement spikes. During expansions, it falls. The lag is important: discouraged workers typically re-enter the labor force only after the job market visibly improves.

The 2008–2009 Great Recession is the most striking example. In 2007, discouraged-worker counts stood around 400,000–500,000. By 2010–2011, during the jobless recovery, discouraged workers had spiked to 900,000–1 million. Many remained discouraged throughout the 2010s; only in the ultra-tight labor markets of 2019–2022 did discouraged-worker counts fall back below 400,000. The lag between the recession ending (technically mid-2009) and discouragement peaking (2010–2011) reveals a lag in worker confidence and labor market recovery.

This lag has important Fed implications. In 2010–2012, when the economy was growing and official unemployment was falling, discouraged workers were still at elevated levels. The Fed at the time was uncertain whether to keep rates near-zero or start normalizing. Looking only at the unemployment rate (which was falling quickly as discouraged workers dropped out of the statistics), policy-makers might have tightened too early. The broader measures (U-5 and U-6) told a different story: substantial slack remained.

The pandemic created a unique shock. In April 2020, unemployment spiked to 14.7%, and discouraged workers jumped. But the recovery was faster than 2008–2009. By mid-2021, discouraged-worker counts had normalized. This reflected the genuine surge in labor demand as the economy reopened and firms couldn't fill vacancies. Discouraged workers quickly became in-demand again, which is why rehiring was rapid. The experience showed that discouragement is reversible if economic conditions genuinely tighten.

Reasons for Discouragement​

Discouraged workers cite various reasons for exiting the labor force, but research and surveys highlight some key factors:

Perceived lack of suitable jobs. Some workers believe no jobs exist in their field, in their region, or at a wage level acceptable given their skills and training. A manufacturing worker in a declining region, or someone whose industry has largely automated, might rationally conclude that searching is futile.

Inadequate education or training. Workers without a high school diploma or without skills aligned to current job openings face longer searches. After multiple rejections or interviews leading nowhere, some give up. Skills-training programs aim to address this, but they require time and resources that many discouraged workers lack.

Age discrimination. Older workers report particular difficulty. Many employers have preferences (explicit or implicit) for younger hires. An older worker competing with younger candidates for the same entry-level job faces long odds. After months of rejection, many stop trying.

Disability or health barriers. Some discouraged workers have health conditions making standard employment difficult but not severe enough to qualify for disability benefits. Chronic pain, mental health issues, or mobility challenges can make job-hunting and work itself burdensome without qualifying as "disabled" for official purposes.

Geographic mismatch. Job growth is concentrated in certain regions (major metros) while population remains dispersed. A worker in a declining rust-belt town faces limited local opportunities and may lack resources to relocate. The search becomes futile; discouragement follows.

Discrimination. Workers from racial minorities, or those with criminal records, may face discrimination in hiring that makes job-hunting less rewarding. Research shows that identical résumés with different names (suggesting race) receive different callback rates. Some workers, aware of or experiencing such bias, might reduce search intensity.

Childcare and family responsibilities. Parents (especially mothers) might struggle to balance job-hunting with childcare. If childcare costs exceed potential wages for available jobs, the worker might exit the labor force. Some of these are classified as discouraged; others as having "family responsibilities."

Bringing Discouraged Workers Back​

If discouraged workers represent unutilized economic potential, the question is how to bring them back. Policy responses typically include:

Tight labor markets (the most effective). The fastest way to reduce discouragement is sustained rapid job creation that visibly tightens the labor market. When firms are aggressively hiring and headlines trumpet worker shortages, discouraged workers see prospects improve and re-enter the search. This happened in 2021–2022 and again in 2023–2024 as labor markets remained relatively tight.

Job training and skill programs. Federal and state programs aim to re-skill workers, particularly in sectors with labor shortages. Examples include apprenticeships, community college programs, and subsidized on-the-job training. These can reduce discouragement by making workers more competitive. However, the impact is often modest; training alone doesn't guarantee jobs.

Wage subsidies and tax credits. The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and other wage subsidies make low-wage work more rewarding, encouraging workers to re-enter the labor force. The evidence is mixed; some workers respond to higher wages by searching and accepting work, while others don't.

Employer incentives. Tax credits for hiring long-term unemployed or workers from disadvantaged groups aim to lower employer hiring barriers. However, the effects are often small; employers don't hire workers they don't need just because there's a tax credit.

Addressing discrimination and barriers. Enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, removal of criminal records, childcare support, and healthcare access (especially mental health) can all reduce structural barriers to employment. These are longer-term efforts but address root causes.

Targeted geographic programs. Regional development initiatives aim to create jobs and economic growth in declining areas, making local job-hunting more rewarding.

The general lesson: discouraged workers respond to real economic opportunity more than to training alone. When jobs are truly abundant, discouragement falls naturally.

Measurement Challenges and Criticisms​

Counting discouraged workers isn't perfect, and there's ongoing debate about how meaningful the count is:

Self-reporting bias. Workers might misreport reasons for not searching. The line between "I couldn't find a suitable job" and "I face childcare barriers" can be blurry. Surveys can't definitively separate them.

Selection into discouragement. Those who report discouragement might be fundamentally different from those who continue searching (possibly less motivated, or facing real barriers the survey can't measure). Comparing discouraged and non-discouraged workers isn't a clean experimental comparison.

Low numbers relative to population. Even in recessions, discouraged-worker counts are in the range of 500,000–1 million, which sounds large but is small relative to a 160+ million labor force. The effect on measured unemployment is real but modest—shifting U-3 from 10% to 10.5% rather than a doubling.

Discouragement is correlated with other factors. Older age, lower education, and certain races are both correlated with discouragement and with barriers to employment. It's hard to isolate what "discouragement" per se contributes versus these other factors.

Despite these critiques, the BLS continues to publish discouraged-worker and underutilization measures. Most labor economists view them as useful additions to the headline unemployment rate, not as replacements for it.

Real-world examples​

The 2008–2009 recession and subsequent recovery illustrate discouraged workers vividly. Unemployment peaked at 10% in October 2009, but labor force participation had already fallen. Over the next few years, as the recovery progressed (officially from mid-2009), discouraged workers remained elevated. An economic analyst using only the headline unemployment rate, which fell from 10% to 7.5% between 2009 and 2013, might have concluded the labor market was normalizing. But U-6, which includes marginally attached workers, stayed elevated above 13% throughout this period. The broader measure revealed that slack was deeper than the headline rate suggested. This discrepancy likely factored into the Fed's decision to maintain near-zero rates longer than traditional models would suggest—the true slack was larger than U-3 indicated.

The oil industry provides a specific sectoral example. In 2014–2016, falling oil prices triggered massive job losses in petroleum engineering and related fields. Many older workers in this field, with specialized skills, found few comparable opportunities as the industry contracted. Some were retrained; others took service jobs; many became discouraged. Engineers in their 50s with two decades in oil couldn't easily transition. Some exited the labor force, becoming discouraged workers. As energy prices recovered and demand rebounded in 2017–2019, some re-entered and found work, but not all. The lag between displacement and re-employment, and the number who never fully recovered, illustrates the slow adjustment process.

Manufacturing in the Midwest offers another example. The decline of auto manufacturing and steel production from 2000–2010 left millions of workers stranded. Many migrated or transitioned to services. But some, particularly older workers with limited education beyond high school, struggled to find comparable-wage work. Discouraged-worker rates in Rust Belt counties likely exceed national averages, though the BLS doesn't publish county-level discouraged-worker counts. Anecdotally, workers in Youngstown, Ohio, or Gary, Indiana, who lost stable industrial jobs often exited the labor force rather than competing for service work at half the pay.

Common mistakes​

Mistake 1: Conflating discouraged workers with lazy workers. Discouragement is often rational—if you've applied to 100 jobs and gotten zero interviews, stopping the search is reasonable, not lazy. Some discouraged workers are among the most job-ready; they've simply become realistic about prospects.

Mistake 2: Assuming discouraged workers will re-enter at wages they left at. A manufacturing worker earning $30/hour in 2005 may be discouraged after finding that available jobs pay $15/hour. If the worker re-enters the labor force, it might be at much lower pay. This creates real welfare losses, even if re-employment occurs.

Mistake 3: Ignoring the lag in discouraged-worker recovery. Policy-makers sometimes assume that once the job market tightens, discouraged workers instantly re-enter and find work. In reality, there's a lag—several months to a year. Workers need to update beliefs, rekindle confidence, and overcome psychological barriers.

Mistake 4: Treating U-6 as "true unemployment." U-6 is a broader measure of labor underutilization, but it includes part-time workers wanting full-time work and marginally attached workers who might not all seek work even if jobs appeared. It's useful context but not a replacement for U-3.

Mistake 5: Assuming all discouraged workers are job-ready. Some discouraged workers face barriers that require intervention (disability support, childcare, transportation) before employment is feasible. Simply tightening the labor market doesn't automatically overcome these.

FAQ​

How many discouraged workers are in the U.S. economy?​

As of early 2024, roughly 400,000–600,000 people are classified as discouraged. This is roughly 0.25% of the labor force. The number fluctuates with the business cycle, rising during recessions and falling during booms.

What's the difference between discouraged workers and marginally attached workers?​

Marginally attached workers are everyone who stopped actively searching in the past 4 weeks but looked for work in the past 12 months. Discouraged workers are a subset: those who stopped because they believe no jobs are available. Others in the marginally-attached group stopped due to school, family, health, or other reasons.

How does discouraged-worker count affect Fed policy?​

The Fed doesn't mechanically respond to discouraged-worker counts, but it considers them as part of assessing labor-market slack. If unemployment is 4% but discouraged workers and other underemployed groups push U-6 to 6%, the Fed might be more cautious about further tightening. Conversely, if both U-3 and U-6 are low, the Fed has less room to accommodate growth.

Are discouraged workers the same as people on disability?​

No. Disability is a legal status involving government benefits and typically involves a medical determination of inability to work. Discouragement is self-reported belief that jobs are unavailable. Some people classified as disabled might also be discouraged (and vice versa), but they're distinct categories.

Can discouraged workers claim unemployment benefits?​

Unemployment insurance requires active job-searching, so discouraged workers who have stopped searching generally don't qualify. This is one reason government unemployment insurance understates true joblessness—benefits expire and recipients either find work or drop out of the labor force.

Why don't more discouraged workers re-enter during economic booms?​

Some do, but not all. Once workers have been out of the labor force for extended periods, re-entry requires overcoming inertia, skill depreciation, and potential employer bias against employment gaps. Additionally, if good jobs are concentrated in different regions or industries than where discouraged workers live, geographic and sectoral mismatches persist.

Summary​

Discouraged workers are people who want to work but have stopped actively searching because they believe no suitable jobs are available. They are excluded from the official unemployment rate but counted in broader measures like U-5 and U-6. Discouraged workers rise during recessions as job-hunting becomes futile and fall during tight expansions when prospects visibly improve. The existence of discouraged workers reveals that the headline unemployment rate understates true economic slack and makes monetary policy harder to calibrate. Bringing discouraged workers back into the labor force requires genuine job creation, skill training, and removal of structural barriers to employment; all three are important, but tight labor markets are the most effective incentive.

Next​

→ Underemployment explained