Holding REITs in an IRA: Tax Advantages and Considerations

Holding REITs (real estate investment trusts) inside an IRA—either traditional or Roth—solves a core tax problem: most REIT distributions arrive as taxable ordinary income at rates far higher than long-term capital gains. By placing REITs in a tax-deferred or tax-free wrapper, investors defer or eliminate taxation on those distributions, a benefit unavailable in taxable accounts.

The REIT dividend tax problem

Most investment returns fall into two buckets: long-term capital gains (taxed at preferential 0%, 15%, or 20% rates) and ordinary income (taxed at your marginal rate, up to 37%). REITs are required by law to distribute at least 90% of their taxable income to shareholders. Crucially, those distributions come largely as ordinary income—rent payments, mortgage interest, and property management revenues—not capital gains. A REIT yielding 4% annually generates 4% in ordinary-income taxable distributions per year in a taxable account. Over a decade, an investor in the 24% tax bracket pays roughly 0.96% per year in REIT taxes alone, compounding away returns.

An IRA eliminates this annual tax drag. Inside a traditional IRA, REIT distributions accumulate tax-free until you withdraw. Inside a Roth IRA, they accumulate entirely tax-free for life. The longer you hold, the more valuable the shelter becomes.

Traditional IRA vs. Roth IRA for REITs

Traditional IRA: Contributions are deductible in the year made (subject to income phase-outs if you have a workplace retirement plan). The account grows untaxed. Withdrawals after age 59½ are taxed as ordinary income. You pay tax on the REIT distributions eventually, but not until you need the money—potentially decades later. This is powerful when you expect to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement, or simply to defer the tax burden and keep compounding uninterrupted.

Roth IRA: Contributions are not deductible, but the account grows entirely tax-free, and qualified withdrawals (age 59½+, five-year holding period met) are tax-free. If your REIT distributes 4% per year over 30 years, you owe zero tax on that growth, provided you follow the rules. For someone young or in a high current tax bracket, a Roth is often the better shelter.

Both accounts have $7,000 annual contribution limits (rising to $8,000 at age 50 in 2024). REITs fit cleanly into either; no special paperwork is required.

Why REITs are particularly suited for IRAs

REITs work exceptionally well inside IRAs for three reasons:

High ordinary-income distribution. While growth-focused stocks might throw off 1–2% in ordinary dividends plus reinvested capital gains, REITs deliver 3–6% in ordinary income. The tax drag in a taxable account is steep. The IRA shelter matters more here than for most holdings.

Limited tax-loss harvesting. Tax-loss harvesting—selling losers to offset gains—is irrelevant inside an IRA. That strategy only works in taxable accounts. In an IRA, you’re not doing it anyway, so you lose nothing by moving REITs there.

No capital-gains taxation on growth. If your REIT portfolio appreciates from $100k to $150k over 15 years, you owe zero capital-gains tax if it sits in an IRA. In a taxable account, you’d owe long-term capital gains tax on the $50k gain upon sale. The IRA avoids both the ongoing distribution tax and the exit tax.

The trade-offs and constraints

The shelter comes with costs. First, liquidity and penalties. Money in a traditional IRA before age 59½ is subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty plus income tax. Roth IRAs allow penalty-free withdrawal of contributions (not earnings) anytime, but withdrawing earnings early triggers the 10% penalty. If you need the REIT holdings in five years, an IRA is the wrong account.

Second, contribution limits. You can only add $7,000 per year to an IRA. For a serious REIT investor with $100k–$500k to deploy, the cap constrains growth. You’ll still use a taxable brokerage account for larger holdings; IRAs are just one layer of a broader portfolio.

Third, required minimum distributions (RMDs). Traditional IRAs require withdrawals starting at age 73 (as of 2023). Roth IRAs have no RMD during the owner’s lifetime. If you want to let a REIT portfolio compound untouched for decades, a Roth is more convenient.

Fourth, no deduction for net investment loss. If your REIT holdings decline, you cannot claim the loss against other income—because losses in IRAs are not recognized for tax purposes. This is a minor downside relative to the distribution-sheltering benefit.

Practical example

Suppose you have $50k to invest in REITs and are 35 years old, in the 24% federal tax bracket.

Taxable account scenario: You buy $50k of a REIT yielding 4.5% annually. Year 1 distributions: $2,250 in ordinary income. Federal tax: $540. After 20 years at 4.5% yield and 7% price appreciation, your account grows to roughly $155k (pre-tax). You’ve paid ~$10k in federal REIT distribution taxes cumulatively, plus capital-gains tax on the $105k gain (roughly $15.75k at 15%). Total tax: ~$25.75k.

Roth IRA scenario: You contribute $7,000 yearly for six years (total $42k). The remaining $8k goes to a taxable account. After 20 years, the Roth account grows to ~$130k entirely tax-free. The $8k taxable grows to $20.7k with the same tax drag as above ($5k in total taxes). Combined: $150.7k, with only $5k in tax paid. The Roth has sheltered ~$20.7k in tax compared to the full-taxable scenario.

The longer the horizon, the larger the advantage. Over 30 years, a $7k annual Roth contribution grows to roughly $380k tax-free—whereas the same in a taxable account would have incurred tens of thousands in cumulative REIT distribution taxes.

When not to hold REITs in an IRA

If you expect capital appreciation (property values rising sharply) to drive most of your REIT returns—and ordinary-income distributions to be minimal—the case for an IRA weakens. You’d be sheltering ordinary income that was never substantial anyway. Conversely, if you’re in a very low tax bracket or expect your retirement tax bracket to be much higher than today’s, traditional IRA tax deferral becomes less attractive.

Also, if you want to actively trade REITs (buy and sell frequently to capture momentum), an IRA’s lack of tax-loss harvesting and the withdrawal penalties on reallocation gains mean you might prefer a taxable account for that flexibility.

See also