REIT 90% Distribution Requirement Explained

The 90% distribution requirement is a core rule of REIT taxation: to qualify as a REIT, a firm must distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to shareholders each year. This rule is the bargain at the heart of REIT status—in exchange for handing most profits to shareholders, the REIT itself pays no corporate income tax.

Why the 90% Rule Exists

The REIT structure was created by Congress in 1960 to allow investors to hold real estate without the double taxation of a corporation. Normally, a corporation pays corporate income tax on profits, and shareholders pay personal income tax on dividends—taxing the same dollar twice. REITs flip this: the REIT itself is tax-exempt at the entity level, provided it passes most of its income to shareholders (who pay personal tax on dividends). The 90% requirement is the enforcement mechanism: if a REIT refuses to distribute, it loses its tax-exempt status and becomes a taxable corporation.

The rule is strict because tax exemption is the reward. If a REIT could hold back significant earnings to reinvest in properties or build cash reserves, it would be evading its share of the tax burden. Forcing 90% distribution ensures shareholders—not the REIT—bear the tax liability on profits. This is why REIT dividends are typically higher and more frequent than dividends from ordinary companies.

What Counts as “Taxable Income”

The 90% threshold is based on taxable income, not cash flow. This is crucial because a REIT can have strong cash flow but lower taxable income due to depreciation and other non-cash deductions.

Taxable income for REIT purposes includes:

• Net rental income (rents minus operating expenses)
• Interest and gains on sales of properties (sometimes with special treatment)
• Income from ancillary businesses (parking, laundry, etc.)
• Minus: depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash deductions

Because depreciation is deductible but not a cash outflow, a REIT might earn $100 million in cash but only $50 million in taxable income (after large depreciation charges). In that case, the 90% requirement applies to the $50 million, not the $100 million.

Capital gains handling is complex. Long-term gains on property sales are included in the 90% base, but some gains may be subject to special rules. A REIT’s annual 10-K filing (see 10-K) explicitly breaks down taxable income available for distribution.

Calculating the Requirement: An Example

Suppose a REIT has:

• Gross rental income: $200 million
• Operating expenses (maintenance, property tax, insurance): $80 million
• Depreciation (non-cash): $40 million
• Interest expense on debt: $30 million

Taxable income = $200M − $80M − $40M − $30M = $50 million

The 90% requirement = $50M × 0.90 = $45 million must be distributed to shareholders.

The REIT can retain $5 million (the remaining 10%) to pay taxes on income passed through to shareholders or to cover unexpected shortfalls. In practice, most REITs distribute 100% or more of taxable income (the excess comes from retained earnings or depreciation add-backs), because they need to distribute strong cash flow to remain competitive and attractive to dividend-focused investors.

Shortfall Penalties and Loss of Status

If a REIT fails to distribute 90% of taxable income in a year:

1. Excise tax: The REIT must pay a 4% federal excise tax on the undistributed amount. So if it should have distributed $45 million and only distributed $40 million, it owes 4% × $5M = $200,000 in penalty.

2. Loss of status: A single year of non-compliance does not automatically strip REIT status, but repeated violations or intentional evasion can trigger reclassification to a taxable corporation, which is devastating. The REIT would then owe corporate income tax retroactively and lose its primary competitive advantage.

3. Shareholder impact: If a REIT is reclassified as a corporation mid-year, shareholders may face unexpected tax bills and valuation writedowns. The REIT’s equity often falls sharply because the tax-exempt status is the entire valuation thesis.

A REIT board is acutely aware of this risk. Compliance is non-negotiable, and finance teams build buffers (distributing more than 90%) to avoid any shortfall due to miscalculation or timing issues.

Timing and Record Date Rules

The distribution must be declared and paid (or recorded for payment) within the REIT’s fiscal year, or by the close of business of its last business day within the calendar year. REITs often declare monthly or quarterly distributions and specify a record date (the date used to determine which shareholders receive the payment). If a distribution is declared before year-end but paid after year-end, it can count toward the current year’s 90% requirement if certain conditions are met.

This timing rule can create complexity at year-end. A REIT might declare a large December distribution to satisfy the full-year 90% threshold, even though the cash payment settles in January. As long as the declaration is timely, it satisfies the requirement.

The Interplay with Distributable Cash Flow

REITs publish a metric called distributable cash flow (or funds available for distribution, FAD), which adjusts taxable income for depreciation and other items to show cash available for dividends. A REIT might have $80 million in FAD but only $50 million in taxable income. The 90% rule applies to the latter, but REITs try to distribute the former to attract investors. This means distributing 160% of taxable income is not unusual.

When distributions exceed 90% of taxable income, the excess comes from depreciation add-backs (non-taxable return of capital) or retained earnings. These distributions are often treated differently for tax purposes—a return of capital reduces the shareholder’s cost basis rather than being fully taxable income.

Why REITs Cannot Reinvest Through Automatic Plans

Because the 90% rule requires distributions to shareholders, not reinvestment within the REIT, most REITs do not offer automatic dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs) that buy additional REIT shares. Shareholders must choose to buy more shares on the open market or in a separate plan. This is a minor inconvenience but reflects the statutory design: the REIT cannot be a closed investment loop; capital must exit annually to shareholders.

See also