Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA)
The Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Income ETF (FTMA) is a fixed-income fund that holds municipal bonds issued by Massachusetts state and local governments, plus obligations of Massachusetts-based public authorities. Investors receive interest payments that are exempt from federal income tax and, crucially, exempt from Massachusetts state income tax — making the after-tax yield materially higher than taxable bonds of similar credit quality.
This entry covers the municipal-bond ETF. For context on how municipal bonds work as an asset class, see the municipal bond overview.
What is a Massachusetts municipal bond, and why would you buy one?
A municipal bond is a debt instrument issued by a state, city, county, school district, water authority, or other public entity to finance capital projects — roads, schools, bridges, sewer systems, courthouses. When you buy one, you are lending money to that public entity, receiving periodic interest payments (the coupon), and eventually getting your principal back at maturity.
The key feature is tax exemption. Interest paid on qualifying municipal bonds is exempt from federal income tax. Interest paid on Massachusetts-issued bonds is additionally exempt from Massachusetts state income tax — and sometimes from local income tax. That means a Massachusetts resident in a high federal and state tax bracket receives the interest free of all income tax. The after-tax yield is much higher than it appears on the surface. A taxable bond yielding 5% might be economically equivalent to a tax-exempt Massachusetts muni yielding 3.5% to an investor in the 37% federal bracket plus a 5% state bracket (roughly 40% combined marginal rate).
FTMA bundles a selection of these Massachusetts-issued bonds into an ETF structure, giving a single investor exposure to multiple issuers and maturities.
Who issues the bonds, and what backs them?
The issuer universe is diverse. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts itself issues general-obligation (GO) bonds backed by the state’s full faith and credit — its taxing power and obligation to repay. Cities and towns — Boston, Cambridge, Worcester, and hundreds of others — issue GO bonds backed by their own revenue and property-tax bases. Public authorities for housing, water, transportation, and education issue revenue bonds backed by the specific revenue stream of the project they finance (toll revenue, water fees, or appropriations from the state budget).
The credit quality varies. Wealthy towns and the state itself carry very low default risk; smaller or fiscally stressed municipalities carry higher risk. FTMA’s portfolio will include a mix: some AAA-rated Massachusetts GO bonds of very high quality, and some lower-rated issues from smaller authorities. The fund does not hold only the safest bonds.
The structure and how it trades
FTMA is an ETF — shares trade on an exchange (NASDAQ or another venue) during the trading day at market-set prices. The fund’s net asset value (NAV) changes as bond prices fluctuate. When interest rates rise, bond prices fall and FTMA’s value drops; when rates fall, bond values rise and FTMA rises. An investor buying shares is buying a slice of the fund’s current portfolio, not the bonds themselves.
This brings a key advantage: liquidity. Buying an individual Massachusetts municipal bond can be cumbersome — bond dealers have limited selection, wide spreads, and high minimums. Buying FTMA shares is as simple as buying any stock. The downside is that FTMA is worth its net asset value — if the portfolio holds Massachusetts bonds that took a credit hit (bad news about a city’s finances, for instance), the fund’s share price can drop sharply, and you realize a loss. Individual bond investors who hold to maturity avoid that mark-to-market loss.
The real risks
The largest risk is interest-rate risk. If the Federal Reserve raises rates and bond yields climb, the market value of FTMA’s bonds falls immediately, and so does the fund’s share price. An investor who sells during that period realizes a loss. To offset that risk, a typical Massachusetts muni fund is laddered across maturities, so that bonds mature regularly and proceeds can be reinvested at new rates.
The second risk is credit risk. Massachusetts is financially healthy as states go, and most of its municipalities are solvent. But fiscal crises happen. A city’s pension liabilities can spiral; a major employer can leave a town; a recession can crater tax receipts. When a major issuer enters distress, its bonds lose value sharply. FTMA will own some such bonds, and credit deterioration is hard to predict.
The third risk is call risk. Many municipal bonds include call provisions allowing the issuer to redeem the bond early if rates fall. That means an investor who was enjoying a high coupon suddenly has their investment returned at par (full value), forcing them to reinvest at lower rates. This typically happens when you would rather not have it happen.
Lastly, state tax changes pose a subtle risk. The tax-exempt status of Massachusetts bonds is set by federal law and state law. Changes to either could erode the after-tax advantage that makes these bonds attractive in the first place.
Who owns this, and how to research it
FTMA appeals primarily to Massachusetts residents in high tax brackets who want tax-exempt income and are willing to accept the credit and rate risks that come with municipal bonds. It is common in retirement accounts held by Massachusetts-based investors. It is less suitable for investors in lower tax brackets (the after-tax advantage shrinks) or those in other states (the state tax exemption applies only to Massachusetts residents).
To research the fund, obtain its factsheet from Franklin Advisers (the sponsor) listing the top holdings, the duration (average maturity), and the credit quality distribution. Compare FTMA’s yield to a broad national municipal-bond ETF — the difference reflects the Massachusetts-specific concentration. Look at the maturity ladder: are the bonds evenly spread across years, or concentrated in shorter or longer maturities? Examine the issuer mix: what portion comes from the state versus cities, towns, and authorities? Read the prospectus for the credit-quality policy and how downgrades are handled. Finally, if you own FTMA, monitor news from Massachusetts regarding any of the larger issuers in the portfolio — fiscal stress from a major city or a state budget crisis can ripple through the fund quickly.