Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF (BCEM)
An emerging market is a country’s economy that is growing fast but not yet fully developed — think India, Brazil, Vietnam, or Thailand. They offer investors a chance to own pieces of fast-growing companies earlier than they might in the wealthy countries. Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF is a fund that bets on exactly that: the most promising emerging market businesses that have what Baron’s managers call a durable competitive advantage. That is, they have a moat — something that makes it hard for rivals to copy their success.
What the fund holds and how it works
Baron Emerging Markets Select ETF (BCEM) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund, meaning that a human portfolio manager is constantly deciding which stocks to buy and sell. It is not passive, tracking an index; it is active, trying to outperform the benchmark through skillful stock picking. The fund invests in companies of any size within emerging markets — so long as they fit Baron’s bottom-up view of high-quality, founder-led, entrepreneurial businesses. The manager, Michael Kass, has spent nearly four decades investing globally and has run Baron’s emerging markets strategy since 2011, so this is not a new philosophy but a longstanding approach translated into an exchange-traded wrapper.
The portfolio is concentrated, meaning BCEM holds fewer positions than a typical emerging-market fund would and takes bigger positions in its highest-conviction picks. The manager will generally exclude less liquid or speculative companies, focusing instead on established names that are positioned to benefit from long-term structural shifts — deglobalization, artificial intelligence, India’s growth, or changes in China’s economic landscape. The holdings span China, Taiwan, South Korea, India, Latin America, and Southeast Asia.
Strategy and investment themes
The fund is built around secular or country-specific growth themes — roughly a dozen at any given time. The manager identifies a structural shift (for example, the relocation of supply chains away from China, or the rise of AI adoption across Asia) and then finds the companies best positioned to benefit. This combines forward-looking theme identification with the disciplined, bottom-up research Baron has practiced for decades. That bottom-up approach means the fund looks at each business on its own merits — its competitive position, its management quality, its financials — rather than simply buying a sector or a country because it looks cheap.
Costs, risks, and who it is for
As an active fund, BCEM charges higher fees than a passive emerging-market index ETF would. Investors pay for the manager’s research and for the chance that the active approach will outperform. The risk, of course, is that it may not. Emerging markets are volatile — currencies fluctuate, governments change policy suddenly, and geopolitical tensions can hit specific regions without warning. The portfolio is also concentrated, which means that if the manager is wrong about a few large positions, the fund’s performance will suffer more than a diversified fund would.
A reader studying BCEM should know that because it is concentrated on high-conviction ideas, you are not buying the whole emerging market — you are buying the manager’s specific view of where value lies. That appeals to investors who have confidence in Baron’s process and are willing to accept higher volatility in exchange for the possibility of higher returns. It is less suitable for someone seeking broad, low-cost emerging-market exposure.
How to research it
Start with Baron’s own materials: the fund prospectus, the fact sheet, and the quarterly shareholder letters all explain the strategy and current themes in more detail. Look at the top ten holdings, which typically make up a large share of the portfolio — those names tell you a lot about where the manager sees opportunity. Track the turnover rate: a concentrated, conviction-driven portfolio typically has modest turnover, not excessive trading. Compare the fund’s returns to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over rolling periods of three years or longer, since this is an active strategy and short-term noise matters less than long-term track record.
Sources: